Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Thank God for that! Not trying to sound sanctimonious but i think many with that inclination towards Wicca should branch off into another group. Many times the true group content (what the group was formed for) is compromised by extraneous subject matter from individuals inclining towards that path. more power to you Devi. Janardana dasa DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 ....ummm...shouldn't that be Thank Goddesss for that!! Sorry, couldn't resisit..! , Janardana Dasa <lightdweller> wrote: > > Thank God for that! > Not trying to sound sanctimonious but i think many with that inclination towards Wicca should branch off into another group. Many times the true group content (what the group was formed for) is compromised by extraneous subject matter from individuals inclining towards that path. more power to you Devi. > Janardana dasa > > > > DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 Ten points for Gryffindor! *lol* Nice one, Asha ;-) Seriously, Shakti Sadhana wishes the new group nothing but success. While the comparative and perspective discussions about these alternative paths can be interesting and eye-opening, they are neither -- as Janardana Dasa pointed out -- our raison d'etre nor our specialty. DB , "her_asha" <her_asha> wrote: > > ...ummm...shouldn't that be Thank Goddess for that!! > Sorry, couldn't resisit..! > > > > , Janardana Dasa > <lightdweller> wrote: > > > > Thank God for that! > > Not trying to sound sanctimonious but i think many with that > inclination towards Wicca should branch off into another group. Many > times the true group content (what the group was formed for) is > compromised by extraneous subject matter from individuals inclining > towards that path. more power to you Devi. > > Janardana dasa > > > > > > > > DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 And why is it Gryffindor? huh! hmmmmmmmm I kinda of like the so called 'Evil' house, where the dark lord [he-who-should-not-be-name] comes from. What is the name of the "house" again? I forgot. , "Devi Bhakta" <devi_bhakta> wrote: > > Ten points for Gryffindor! *lol* > > Nice one, Asha ;-) > > Seriously, Shakti Sadhana wishes the new group nothing but success. > While the comparative and perspective discussions about these > alternative paths can be interesting and eye-opening, they are > neither -- as Janardana Dasa pointed out -- our raison d'etre nor our > specialty. > > DB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 Slytherin , "NMadasamy" <nmadasamy@s...> wrote: > > > And why is it Gryffindor? huh! > > hmmmmmmmm I kinda of like the so called 'Evil' house, where the dark > lord [he-who-should-not-be-name] comes from. What is the name of > the "house" again? I forgot. > > > > , "Devi Bhakta" > <devi_bhakta> wrote: > > > > Ten points for Gryffindor! *lol* > > > > Nice one, Asha ;-) > > > > Seriously, Shakti Sadhana wishes the new group nothing but > success. > > While the comparative and perspective discussions about these > > alternative paths can be interesting and eye-opening, they are > > neither -- as Janardana Dasa pointed out -- our raison d'etre nor > our > > specialty. > > > > DB > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Arn't Wicca & Tantra the same ? Demonstrative paths ? But yes, when we use the term Shakti, we mean Vedic/Hindu, and focus is important. No point bringing in Athena, Hearn, et all, even though they appear so wonderful. Hey guys, so difficult understanding me myself; and Janardana's focus is so right, so let us love our sweet Devi here. asato ma sat gamaya, tamaso ma jyotir gamaya, mrityor ma amritam gamaya -----Janardana Dasa <lightdweller wrote: Thank God for that! Not trying to sound sanctimonious but i think many with that inclination towards Wicca should branch off into another group. Many times the true group content (what the group was formed for) is compromised by extraneous subject matter from individuals inclining towards that path. more power to you Devi. Janardana dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2006 Report Share Posted January 17, 2006 Red, What do you mean by "demonstrative path"? They are the same in the way that aged sharp cheddar cheese is like Velveeta processed cheese product. Namaste, Felicia , Redder Red <redderred> wrote: > > Arn't Wicca & Tantra the same ? Demonstrative paths ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2006 Report Share Posted January 17, 2006 Hi Felicia, I don't know about cheese :-), but from what I figured, both Tantra and Wicca incorporate physically preformed rituals, at least in the initial stages, before one can perform them internally. This is what I meant when I used the term demonstrative, meaning something one does or demonstrates. Sorry if I got it all wrong. Much love, Red Felicia <hygeiea44 wrote: Red, What do you mean by "demonstrative path"? They are the same in the way that aged sharp cheddar cheese is like Velveeta processed cheese product. Namaste, Felicia , Redder Red <redderred> wrote: > > Arn't Wicca & Tantra the same ? Demonstrative paths ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.