Guest guest Posted February 21, 2006 Report Share Posted February 21, 2006 Why should we make a difference between a pot and a cloth as their apparent difference is simply illusory according to [previous] rule? The foregoing name answers the question. sarasvati is the deity who presides over knowledge, ie. she is the form of the ocean of the knowledge. That means non-sensuous knowledge. The meaning is that though in the understanding of ordinary objects such as "pot etc" no bewilderment arises, as Bh-gitA [V.15] says, "Knowledge is covered by nescience hence people are bewildered," and it is necessary to confuse sinful men because they are devoid of divine grace : to conceal from them the knowledge of non-duality which is the highest human desires and which removes all sorrow. According to Dhaumya, Sarasvati is a girl of two years of age. The BhAradvAja-smr says, "Sarasvati is she who ever resides in the tongue of all beings and who causes speech, hence she is called Sarasvati by great rsis". The VAsistha-RAmAyana also says, "She is called Sarasvati because she is the stream of sense-impression"[see footnote] BhAskararAya's Commentary Translated into English by R. Ananthakrishna Sastry. [Foot note} Bh-NArA: Saras the flow [of nectar] from Brahmarandhra, vati, the possessor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 SaraswatI is the form She takes to dispel the confusion or moha mentioned in the previous name [703/sarva-mohinI], and to give jNAna of the advaita or the absolute. SaraswatI is Her power as jNAna sakti. - Dr. C. Suryanarayana Murthy, Commentary on the Sri Lalita Sahasranama, 1962 , "NMadasamy" <nmadasamy wrote: > > > > Why should we make a difference between a pot and a cloth as their > apparent difference is simply illusory according to [previous] rule? > The foregoing name answers the question. > > sarasvati is the deity who presides over knowledge, ie. she is the > form of the ocean of the knowledge. That means non-sensuous knowledge. > The meaning is that though in the understanding of ordinary objects > such as "pot etc" no bewilderment arises, as Bh-gitA [V.15] > says, "Knowledge is covered by nescience hence people are bewildered," > and it is necessary to confuse sinful men because they are devoid of > divine grace : to conceal from them the knowledge of non-duality which > is the highest human desires and which removes all sorrow. > > According to Dhaumya, Sarasvati is a girl of two years of age. The > BhAradvAja-smr says, "Sarasvati is she who ever resides in the tongue > of all beings and who causes speech, hence she is called Sarasvati by > great rsis". The VAsistha-RAmAyana also says, "She is called Sarasvati > because she is the stream of sense-impression"[see footnote] > > > > BhAskararAya's Commentary > Translated into English by R. Ananthakrishna Sastry. > > > [Foot note} > Bh-NArA: Saras the flow [of nectar] from Brahmarandhra, vati, the > possessor. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.