Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Hi Raji: You are correct; the LS ordering is different for some reason, but I believe the Sat-Chakra-Nirupana remains authoritative for ordering. LS simply describes and praises each of the chakras as a form of Lalitha. It does not prescribe a particular method for working with the chakras, as Sat-Chakra-Nirupana does. In any event, you've given me an idea. I am thinking it might be a useful resource to add the LS references to the SS Chakra pages, at least as a point of comparison, referencing the LS numbers of course, but restoring them to the proper correspondence with Sat-Chakra- Nirupana. Does anyone see a problem with this? DB , "rajeshwari iyer" <rajii31 wrote: > > Dear DB. > > I went through the below site and gathered new information on chakras - > they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it easy to > digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final few words > are simple to remember and can be put into practice. > > I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where Kundalini > sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same order as > what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those sakti's in LS > translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it different > .raji > > ____________________ ____ > > > >Anyone interested may also find dhyanaslokas -- along with > >Woodroffe's translations, Amrita's explanations and beautiful > >illustrations -- on the homepage starting at the Chakras menu: > > > >http://www.shaktisadhana.org/Photo%20Gallery/cakrasmain.html > > > >DB > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Dear DB I v already posted wot seemed to be the explanation for the ordering in LS. Can u give ur feed back on that? Also about Reiki, I v quoted the mantra with its meaning which occurs in yajur veda which describes the process of reiki. A full fledged discussion on this wd take pages so I leave here for now Om Namas Tripurasundari Devi Bhakta <devi_bhakta wrote: Hi Raji: You are correct; the LS ordering is different for some reason, but I believe the Sat-Chakra-Nirupana remains authoritative for ordering. LS simply describes and praises each of the chakras as a form of Lalitha. It does not prescribe a particular method for working with the chakras, as Sat-Chakra-Nirupana does. In any event, you've given me an idea. I am thinking it might be a useful resource to add the LS references to the SS Chakra pages, at least as a point of comparison, referencing the LS numbers of course, but restoring them to the proper correspondence with Sat-Chakra- Nirupana. Does anyone see a problem with this? DB , "rajeshwari iyer" <rajii31 wrote: > > Dear DB. > > I went through the below site and gathered new information on chakras - > they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it easy to > digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final few words > are simple to remember and can be put into practice. > > I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where Kundalini > sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same order as > what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those sakti's in LS > translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it different > .raji > > ____________________ ____ > > > >Anyone interested may also find dhyanaslokas -- along with > >Woodroffe's translations, Amrita's explanations and beautiful > >illustrations -- on the homepage starting at the Chakras menu: > > > >http://www.shaktisadhana.org/Photo%20Gallery/cakrasmain.html > > > >DB > > > Traditions Divine Hinduism Visit your group "" on the web. Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Hi Sankar It's not Paathabhedam, but only ucchaarana bhedam I salute u sankara menon <kochu1tz wrote: Athellam sari appane. Ennalum mantrathukku ithina paadhabhedam irukkathu. Radhakrishnan J <jayaarshree wrote: Hi Raji I d written 'lang'. Read it as 'lung'. It is actually 'lum' as pointed out by our learned friend Sankara Menon. But the final bindu must be nasalised to become more effective. Another point. I am also an Iyer, so I said use Iyer Tamil. No offence. In fact I love iyer Tamil, which I use every where as it comes most naturally to me. Om Nams Tripurasundari rajeshwari iyer <rajii31 wrote: Dear DB. I went through the below site and gathered new information on chakras - they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it easy to digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final few words are simple to remember and can be put into practice. I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where Kundalini sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same order as what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those sakti's in LS translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it different ..raji ________________________ > >Anyone interested may also find dhyanaslokas -- along with >Woodroffe's translations, Amrita's explanations and beautiful >illustrations -- on the homepage starting at the Chakras menu: > >http://www.shaktisadhana.org/Photo%20Gallery/cakrasmain.html > >DB > Traditions Divine Hinduism Visit your group "" on the web. Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Traditions Divine Hinduism Visit your group "" on the web. Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Traditions Divine Hinduism Visit your group "" on the web. Mail Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Hi Raji: I looked quickly back through posts, and -- please forgive me -- I cannot find your proposed explanation for the LS ordering. Could you kindly let me know the message number, or excerpt your statement in response? Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience DB , Radhakrishnan J <jayaarshree wrote: > > Dear DB > I v already posted wot seemed to be the explanation for the ordering in LS. Can u give ur feed back on that? > Also about Reiki, I v quoted the mantra with its meaning which occurs in yajur veda which describes the process of reiki. A full fledged discussion on this wd take pages so I leave here for now > Om Namas Tripurasundari > > Devi Bhakta <devi_bhakta wrote: > Hi Raji: > > You are correct; the LS ordering is different for some reason, but I > believe the Sat-Chakra-Nirupana remains authoritative for ordering. > LS simply describes and praises each of the chakras as a form of > Lalitha. It does not prescribe a particular method for working with > the chakras, as Sat-Chakra-Nirupana does. > > In any event, you've given me an idea. I am thinking it might be a > useful resource to add the LS references to the SS Chakra pages, at > least as a point of comparison, referencing the LS numbers of course, > but restoring them to the proper correspondence with Sat-Chakra- > Nirupana. > > Does anyone see a problem with this? > > DB > > > > , "rajeshwari iyer" > <rajii31@> wrote: > > > > Dear DB. > > > > I went through the below site and gathered new information on > chakras - > > they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it > easy to > > digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final > few words > > are simple to remember and can be put into practice. > > > > I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where > Kundalini > > sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same > order as > > what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those sakti's > in LS > > translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it > different > > .raji > > > > > ____________________ > ____ > > > > > >Anyone interested may also find dhyanaslokas -- along with > > >Woodroffe's translations, Amrita's explanations and beautiful > > >illustrations -- on the homepage starting at the Chakras menu: > > > > > >http://www.shaktisadhana.org/Photo%20Gallery/cakrasmain.html > > > > > >DB > > > > > > > Traditions Divine Hinduism > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > > Mail > Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 Hi DB, Below information- is what I have in my record. Other details, I did not save but noted down and deleted. Below , I posted LS site(from your web page), please go to page 26 - titled KUNDILINI. where respective saktis are mentioned along with their food offerings. When I opened Amrita's link - I found different order. For eg: DAKINI represents muladhara whereas in your note DAKINI represented VISHUDHA chakra along with Amrita and other saktis. This difference what prompted me to ask you. raji --\ -------------------------- Subject : NOTE: LalithA SahasranAma [534]: End of Chakras With name 534, we complete the Chakra Series of the Namas that began with Nama 475. These detailed the seven chakras, the seven bodily tissues governed by them, their presiding deities, and their NaivedyAs,the YoginIs or attendants, and the Nama aspect of Reality as letters of the alphabet (or MAtrikA) from A to Ksa. At deeper levels of interpretation, these Namas also represent the seven planes of consciousness (or lokAs), and the various stages of an embryo's development in the womb of its Mother. --> > >yAkinyambAsvarUpini : Assuming the form of the mother YAkini --\ -------------------------> > YOU MAY FIND SAKTI'S REPRESENTING CHAKRAS IN BELOW SITE.. Please go to page 26 Titled Kundilini. http://shaktisadhana.50megs.com/images/Kochu/Lalitasahasranama.html --\ ------------------------- > > >Hi Raji: > >You are correct; the LS ordering is different for some reason, but I >believe the Sat-Chakra-Nirupana remains authoritative for ordering. >LS simply describes and praises each of the chakras as a form of >Lalitha. It does not prescribe a particular method for working with >the chakras, as Sat-Chakra-Nirupana does. > >In any event, you've given me an idea. I am thinking it might be a >useful resource to add the LS references to the SS Chakra pages, at >least as a point of comparison, referencing the LS numbers of course, >but restoring them to the proper correspondence with Sat-Chakra- >Nirupana. > >Does anyone see a problem with this? > >DB > > > >, "rajeshwari iyer" ><rajii31 wrote: > > > > Dear DB. > > > > I went through the below site and gathered new information on >chakras - > > they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it >easy to > > digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final >few words > > are simple to remember and can be put into practice. > > > > I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where >Kundalini > > sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same >order as > > what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those sakti's >in LS > > translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it >different > > .raji > > > > >____________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2006 Report Share Posted March 2, 2006 Thanks Raji: I will look back through these and try to think it through and see if anything comes up -- then will get back to you. Thanks for summarizing for me. DB , "rajeshwari iyer" <rajii31 wrote: > > Hi DB, > > Below information- is what I have in my record. Other details, I did not > save but noted down and deleted. Below , I posted LS site(from your web > page), please go to page 26 - titled KUNDILINI. where respective saktis are > mentioned along with their food offerings. > > When I opened Amrita's link - I found different order. For eg: DAKINI > represents muladhara whereas in your note DAKINI represented VISHUDHA chakra > along with Amrita and other saktis. This difference what prompted me to ask > you. raji > -- ---- - > Subject : NOTE: LalithA SahasranAma [534]: End of Chakras > > > With name 534, we complete the Chakra Series of the Namas that began > with Nama 475. > > These detailed the seven chakras, the seven bodily tissues governed by > them, their presiding deities, and their NaivedyAs,the YoginIs or > attendants, and the Nama aspect of Reality as letters of the alphabet > (or MAtrikA) from A to Ksa. At deeper levels of interpretation, these > Namas also represent the seven planes of consciousness (or lokAs), and > the various stages of an embryo's development in the womb of its > Mother. > > > --> > > > >yAkinyambAsvarUpini : Assuming the form of the mother YAkini > -- ---- > > > > YOU MAY FIND SAKTI'S REPRESENTING CHAKRAS IN BELOW SITE.. Please go to page > 26 Titled Kundilini. > > http://shaktisadhana.50megs.com/images/Kochu/Lalitasahasranama.html > > > -- ---- > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi Raji: > > > >You are correct; the LS ordering is different for some reason, but I > >believe the Sat-Chakra-Nirupana remains authoritative for ordering. > >LS simply describes and praises each of the chakras as a form of > >Lalitha. It does not prescribe a particular method for working with > >the chakras, as Sat-Chakra-Nirupana does. > > > >In any event, you've given me an idea. I am thinking it might be a > >useful resource to add the LS references to the SS Chakra pages, at > >least as a point of comparison, referencing the LS numbers of course, > >but restoring them to the proper correspondence with Sat-Chakra- > >Nirupana. > > > >Does anyone see a problem with this? > > > >DB > > > > > > > >, "rajeshwari iyer" > ><rajii31@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear DB. > > > > > > I went through the below site and gathered new information on > >chakras - > > > they are not easy to remember - I need to work at it. I found it > >easy to > > > digest Amrita's explanation than Johnwoodoffer's. Amrita's final > >few words > > > are simple to remember and can be put into practice. > > > > > > I have a question - Please refer to your own site on LS - where > >Kundalini > > > sakti's are addressed. My point is that they are not in the same > >order as > > > what Amritha or Woodoffe offers.. You too dealt with those sakti's > >in LS > > > translation. I followed them, and made my own notes. I find it > >different > > > .raji > > > > > > > >___________________ _ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.