Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Re; Quantum Conspiracy -- letter from Thomas Love

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>

>>>*Spirit* W<alk>s! ~Spirit~ T*Alks!

 

Thought I was a river ...

 

then awash! -- a SoaRing geyser!!

 

 

{imagine, walk, the TINIEST steps Too-Day ...

too TOO power-Full! - - -

 

nearly Impossible, im-PASS-able!}

 

 

Provincial CULT of right and wrong is unethical, fraudulent,

'morality' ... i.e., immoral ethics! Ignor-Ants!

 

[Province-Culls! ... local, not international, not intercultural,

not multilingual ...] sans respect, aka true-love!

 

The WAY of the global, natural, gentling, polishing,

refining, evolving ... balancing ... feminine nurturing ...

Asian, Polynesian, Aboriginal ...

 

 

that TODAY is largely, small-ly, the river to fulfillment,

completion -- awakening the GREAT !GLOBAL*C!

 

we, thee and me ....

 

harmony,

 

 

 

Millennium Twain

 

http://www.gaaagle.com/blog/

 

~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~

 

In Visionary_Shamanism, Nameless Wanderer wrote:

 

Re: Quantum Conspiracy -- letter from Thomas Love

 

i think morals and ethics are most of the problem. morality goes

against nature, and as such, drives people away from their spirit.

rather than doing what is powerful for them, or doing what their

spirit guides them to, they decide by what they have been trained

to, right and wrong. living by the rights and wrong of a society is

like coming to a fork in the road, right is to the left and wrong is

to the right, you choose one and clump yorself into the group of all

who have done the same. spirit is not predictable or typical, so it

would not be one way or the other, it would be all ways. go with

right for long enough untill it starts to become wrong, in the

middle there is spirit. doing any movement along the path not big or

far enough to reach spirit leaves stagnant. may work for you, but

its not my choice

 

Visionary_Shamanism, Caroline Smith

<csevermore wrote:

>

> I had a whole array of images going through my mind at how

unprepared science treats it all. As if everything is an

object...and not just that, but as if the object does not have a

spirit. Or any kind of greater force within.

>

> For example, me. I go outside and notice a pile of leaves (for

example) and ask why I stare at them. Then they fly up and swirl

like to tell me, nothing is being ignored. Basically these sort of

situations do put the knowledge of mortality, so that I don't forget

to live the life in the body I have...and to not quickly live

through the leaves (or scientific studiers and what they

study)...but that my own life has great importance just as the

leaves are. I

>

> don't see why science is so careless in the study methods...nor

the way they present and/or market "their" knowledge. Why isn't it

shared openly? Is nature really too much for all of us to have

access to? Or is nature just too elite for those not in the

superior "intellects" of mortal society? (will the greedy humans

now please leave center stage) The thing is, the more they

monopolize a life (leaves for example) the less they are open to

being "studied" by the real spirits and souls, or Great Spirit. I

don't like the way scientists remove their actions from their

studies and simply dive after the unknown without regard to all

us "objects" feeling their actions, thereby knowing what they do and

who they aren't. Then explaining how a person "isn't" to those

souls from the other world but in this world who do guard and

protect and help...since they can help someone get through any kind

of attack from one who claims they "aren't" even tho anyone can see

they "are".

>

> I think people really need to start being educated on how to be

kind, and basic moral ethics...it needs to be taught the same as

other subjects. It's real sad that an intelligent society will not

teach morals to the youth...but when they do something wrong and go

to jail that is considered the teaching. Then there's the white

collar criminals whose crimes against society are far more reaching

than environmental pollution and other greed crimes. But I'll stop

now. I've tried to ask kindly for the greedy humans to give up

their ways, since they don't, I've asked them to leave center

stage. Maybe it's really them who are the objects..and not, me for

example, or leaves....in their minds. How else could a conscious

soul let such greed exist unless they imagine their own self as the

victim instead of the real victim as anyone can see?

>

> Not the well put together document you requested below. But

worth a moment maybe.

> Caroline

>

> Millennium Twain <yonibluestar wrote:

> ~~

> ~~~

>

> thanks, Tom!

>

> nice to get some refreshment of my memory re:

> the foundations of the Quantum nonsensicum! [more

> history of peer manure aggregation process!]

>

> good to see that the 'ThrowDingus' allegedly intended

> a real field description of the internal dynamic topologies

> of the electron, proton, atom and nucleus -- not a

> probabalistic distribution of political 'pointedness'!

>

> if you run into any clearly-focused documentations of

> the orchestration of the science-fraud of quantum

> mechanics from the early 20th century I would be

> very interested to read and share it.

>

> as I recall GRT and Classical Electrodynamics -- as they

> were taught at Stanford -- neither sought nor attempted

> a whole description of nature based on either common

> sense or observation. strictly political indoctrination

> and the formalisms constructed therefrom.

>

> I have seen no writings to date on the assemblage of the

> Quantum Physics conspiracy -- and would also be pleased

> to receive anything on that subject you run across or

> have in your archives.

>

> the only discussion on the subect, other than my writings,

> which I have witnessed was a Brown Bag Lecture Series

> talk at SLAC a decade or so ago -- on the subject of the

> orchestrated rise of Planck, and descendance of Mach, and

> resultant suicide of Bolzmann. naturally, the book upon

> which the lecture was based was not intended for publication

> until the world came into a much greater era of connectivity

> and peace!

>

> with all our sacred relations,

>

>

> Millennium Twain

>

> ..

>

> .

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...