Guest guest Posted March 29, 2006 Report Share Posted March 29, 2006 93 Wow! Better he took openly Islam or Christianity then, it'll be more easy to claim superiority over everyone LOL. Sad thing is, that such people spoil the name of Tantrism. Perhaps that Vikram never even met Amrita. Yes, it was doubtful from the beginning, he was overemphasizing himself being kaula, dikshita and so on... A , "NMadasamy" <ashwini_puralasamy wrote: > > NO! All of you are wrong! Sankara Menon is wrong, Arjuna is wrong > and Radhakrishnan is also wrong! Look what my good friend vikram has > send me to assert his claim that he as a kuala is superior. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Dear Great Upaskas & Shaktas, Kaula prathishTham na Kuryat. Sarva SamO Bhavet. Sa Muktho Bhavati. ramakrishnan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Yes let us march always onwards....into the starry blue....none shall deter us...we shall not want.... - sankara menon Wednesday, March 29, 2006 10:59 PM Re: Re: Kaula superior to vama? Did u notice that the person responsible for the ruckus has gone completly silent?? Just watching the fun and laughing?? So lets not make ourselves laughing stocks and let nothing deter us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 All i ask is could we all please share our thoughts with respect towards the scriptures the teachers and the sadhaks and abstain from disrespect and feelings of superiority to other paths and gurus and sadhaks. Maybe you didn´t notice it but there is now a constant flood of postings on this list where people ridicule and laugh at others ideas, pretend to be the mouthpiece of devi or nature or kaula some even sign their postings with devis name instead of their to enforce their divinity. Let us please stop this and ignore distractions. , Vir Rawlley <redderred wrote: > > I do agree with you as to why we are here in SS. If you will notice I, as well as Charu, shared our thoughts. However for me the topic of 'superiority' does not make sense. Discussing our paths, yes. If x,y,z think their path is superior, good for them and may they progress quicker, and hopefully in compassion return and lead me too. > > mahahradanatha <mahahradanatha wrote: > , charu jagat <charu_jagat@> > wrote: > > > > I have one thing to say......does being chara this or chara that > matter! you could have read all the books! had all the guru's! > followed all the paths and still not got it - who gets it, how they > get it......its the work of grace and of humility. > > > > Tarini > > > > > Vir Rawlley <redderred@> wrote: > > What a waste of time is superiority ! > > > Yes of course it does matter. In my opinion discussion and sharing > of our thoughts, information and experiences on the different paths > of Sadhana with Foccus on Shakti Sadhana is the aim of this group. > What practical help does your posting offer or what does it add to > that discussion except to proclaim the superiority of your path > (bhakti) or yourself compared with others? > Mahahradanatha > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > > New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Yes, I like that idea. It's been a long time since a scripture was discussed here. I have a question and that is could someone list the main nigamas? - mahahradanatha Thursday, March 30, 2006 5:29 AM Re: Kaula superior to vama? All i ask is could we all please share our thoughts with respect towards the scriptures the teachers and the sadhaks and abstain from disrespect and feelings of superiority to other paths and gurus and sadhaks. Maybe you didn´t notice it but there is now a constant flood of postings on this list where people ridicule and laugh at others ideas, pretend to be the mouthpiece of devi or nature or kaula some even sign their postings with devis name instead of their to enforce their divinity. Let us please stop this and ignore distractions. , Vir Rawlley <redderred wrote: > > I do agree with you as to why we are here in SS. If you will notice I, as well as Charu, shared our thoughts. However for me the topic of 'superiority' does not make sense. Discussing our paths, yes. If x,y,z think their path is superior, good for them and may they progress quicker, and hopefully in compassion return and lead me too. > > mahahradanatha <mahahradanatha wrote: > , charu jagat <charu_jagat@> > wrote: > > > > I have one thing to say......does being chara this or chara that > matter! you could have read all the books! had all the guru's! > followed all the paths and still not got it - who gets it, how they > get it......its the work of grace and of humility. > > > > Tarini > > > > > Vir Rawlley <redderred@> wrote: > > What a waste of time is superiority ! > > > Yes of course it does matter. In my opinion discussion and sharing > of our thoughts, information and experiences on the different paths > of Sadhana with Foccus on Shakti Sadhana is the aim of this group. > What practical help does your posting offer or what does it add to > that discussion except to proclaim the superiority of your path > (bhakti) or yourself compared with others? > Mahahradanatha > > > > > > > > Visit your group "" on the web. > > > > > Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > > > New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. > > > -- a.. Visit your group "" on the web. b.. c.. -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 I am sorry to have offended you my Brother. Please forgive me. mahahradanatha <mahahradanatha wrote: All i ask is could we all please share our thoughts with respect towards the scriptures the teachers and the sadhaks and abstain from disrespect and feelings of superiority to other paths and gurus and sadhaks. Maybe you didn�t notice it but there is now a constant flood of postings on this list where people ridicule and laugh at others ideas, pretend to be the mouthpiece of devi or nature or kaula some even sign their postings with devis name instead of their to enforce their divinity. Let us please stop this and ignore distractions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Have you thought that Maa might want it like that on this site! all of us mad-house have to tolerate each other. By the way, Tarini is my initiation name given by my Guru and I use it too. Tarini mahahradanatha <mahahradanatha wrote: All i ask is could we all please share our thoughts with respect towards the scriptures the teachers and the sadhaks and abstain from disrespect and feelings of superiority to other paths and gurus and sadhaks. Maybe you didn´t notice it but there is now a constant flood of postings on this list where people ridicule and laugh at others ideas, pretend to be the mouthpiece of devi or nature or kaula some even sign their postings with devis name instead of their to enforce their divinity. Let us please stop this and ignore distractions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Dont take offense to me, am harmless and for me everything is divine. Even your upset. Tarini charu jagat <charu_jagat wrote: Have you thought that Maa might want it like that on this site! all of us mad-house have to tolerate each other. By the way, Tarini is my initiation name given by my Guru and I use it too. Tarini mahahradanatha <mahahradanatha wrote: All i ask is could we all please share our thoughts with respect towards the scriptures the teachers and the sadhaks and abstain from disrespect and feelings of superiority to other paths and gurus and sadhaks. Maybe you didn´t notice it but there is now a constant flood of postings on this list where people ridicule and laugh at others ideas, pretend to be the mouthpiece of devi or nature or kaula some even sign their postings with devis name instead of their to enforce their divinity. Let us please stop this and ignore distractions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Hi All, Since in this email dear sankara menon has mentioned "nothing JUST NOTHING not conneceted with sadhana be allowed", I would like to apologies if I have added / created any confuions by my earlier emails ( this I am not the starter of this or any threads which would add confusion at least thats what I think). But my intent is always to learn, progress and help others to progress... Thanks and Regards Dp On 3/29/06, sankara menon <kochu1tz wrote: > > i fully agree!! Thats eactly what their intention is!! Create confusion. > If anyone leaves the group they have removed one rom the scene and to that > extent they are successful. Hereafter I will put my foot down and insist > that nothing JUST NOTHING not conneceted with sadhana be allowed. I am fed > up with these tricks. > Did u notice that the person responsible for the ruckus has gone > completly silent?? Just watching the fun and laughing?? So lets not make > ourselves laughing stocks and let nothing deter us. > > > Llundrub <llundrub wrote: > This arguing is tiresome and egotistical. It reminds me of old school > scholarly Theosophists more than mystics or yogis. > > Kaula, vama...yada...where's the love and where's the knowledge? > > This is like talking about food and arguing over purported leftovers when > there wasn't actually any food or leftovers. > > I'm starving. > > I must go eat...elsewhere..... > > > - > Arjuna Taranandanatha > > Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:58 AM > Re: Kaula superior to vama? > > > 93 > > Wow! Better he took openly Islam or Christianity then, it'll be more easy > to claim superiority over everyone LOL. > > Sad thing is, that such people spoil the name of Tantrism. > > Perhaps that Vikram never even met Amrita. Yes, it was doubtful from the > beginning, he was overemphasizing himself being kaula, dikshita and so on... > > A > > > , "NMadasamy" > <ashwini_puralasamy wrote: > > > > NO! All of you are wrong! Sankara Menon is wrong, Arjuna is wrong > > and Radhakrishnan is also wrong! Look what my good friend vikram has > > send me to assert his claim that he as a kuala is superior. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 I am sorry I was a bit upset at ppl distracting. lets go on as before depending on members' self restraint and no moderation. Who am I to judge!! Dhirendra Pal Singh <dpal.singh wrote: Hi All, Since in this email dear sankara menon has mentioned "nothing JUST NOTHING not conneceted with sadhana be allowed", I would like to apologies if I have added / created any confuions by my earlier emails ( this I am not the starter of this or any threads which would add confusion at least thats what I think). But my intent is always to learn, progress and help others to progress... Thanks and Regards Dp On 3/29/06, sankara menon <kochu1tz wrote: > > i fully agree!! Thats eactly what their intention is!! Create confusion. > If anyone leaves the group they have removed one rom the scene and to that > extent they are successful. Hereafter I will put my foot down and insist > that nothing JUST NOTHING not conneceted with sadhana be allowed. I am fed > up with these tricks. > Did u notice that the person responsible for the ruckus has gone > completly silent?? Just watching the fun and laughing?? So lets not make > ourselves laughing stocks and let nothing deter us. > > > Llundrub <llundrub wrote: > This arguing is tiresome and egotistical. It reminds me of old school > scholarly Theosophists more than mystics or yogis. > > Kaula, vama...yada...where's the love and where's the knowledge? > > This is like talking about food and arguing over purported leftovers when > there wasn't actually any food or leftovers. > > I'm starving. > > I must go eat...elsewhere..... > > > - > Arjuna Taranandanatha > > Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:58 AM > Re: Kaula superior to vama? > > > 93 > > Wow! Better he took openly Islam or Christianity then, it'll be more easy > to claim superiority over everyone LOL. > > Sad thing is, that such people spoil the name of Tantrism. > > Perhaps that Vikram never even met Amrita. Yes, it was doubtful from the > beginning, he was overemphasizing himself being kaula, dikshita and so on... > > A > > > , "NMadasamy" > <ashwini_puralasamy wrote: > > > > NO! All of you are wrong! Sankara Menon is wrong, Arjuna is wrong > > and Radhakrishnan is also wrong! Look what my good friend vikram has > > send me to assert his claim that he as a kuala is superior. Visit your group "" on the web. New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 On 3/30/06, sankara menon <kochu1tz wrote: > > I am sorry I was a bit upset at ppl distracting. lets go on as before > depending on members' self restraint and no moderation. Who am I to judge!! But you do have a very valid point and I am glad that you caught it. Lets all be aware of it.. Thanks and Regards Dp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.