Guest guest Posted April 1, 2006 Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 > Your piece on 'nothing but nature' is excellent but full of specious arguments -- like Satan's when he actively advocated eating of the fruit to Eve -- flawed in basic logic. You say every thing is nature. Yeah, that's true. Who is disputing that. We call it prakrti. Then you start bullcrapping God, Maa, spirituality etc. > In the same breath you want all of us live with nature, naturally etc., What do you exactly mean by living with nature. Animals live with nature, their main occupation is searching for food, mating for reproduction and dying. Do you want us to be like that. Then even writing the piece you did was unnatural. You talk of organised religions straightjacketing its practitioners. Agreed. But not spirituality. Spirituality has nothing to do with religion. Spirituality is the natural effort that swells up from deep within in quest of liberation and not straightjacketing. Are you an athiest? Are you agnostic? Are you an existentialist? These all are straightjackets in one way or the other. Either you are mistaken in your perception of what nature is or yuo are deliberately trying to mislead others. There is no cogency in your arguments other than bullcrapping god etc. Please make it clear what living in nature, living in (comm)unity etc are, how we should go abuot it so that imbeciles like me can illuminated and enlightened. Count me and Vir in sir Radhakrishnan. Ralph Nataraj. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2006 Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 Amen to that :-D Ralph Nataraj <108 wrote: > Your piece on 'nothing but nature' is excellent but full of specious arguments -- like Satan's when he actively advocated eating of the fruit to Eve -- flawed in basic logic. You say every thing is nature. Yeah, that's true. Who is disputing that. We call it prakrti. Then you start bullcrapping God, Maa, spirituality etc. > In the same breath you want all of us live with nature, naturally etc., What do you exactly mean by living with nature. Animals live with nature, their main occupation is searching for food, mating for reproduction and dying. Do you want us to be like that. Then even writing the piece you did was unnatural. You talk of organised religions straightjacketing its practitioners. Agreed. But not spirituality. Spirituality has nothing to do with religion. Spirituality is the natural effort that swells up from deep within in quest of liberation and not straightjacketing. Are you an athiest? Are you agnostic? Are you an existentialist? These all are straightjackets in one way or the other. Either you are mistaken in your perception of what nature is or yuo are deliberately trying to mislead others. There is no cogency in your arguments other than bullcrapping god etc. Please make it clear what living in nature, living in (comm)unity etc are, how we should go abuot it so that imbeciles like me can illuminated and enlightened. Count me and Vir in sir Radhakrishnan. Ralph Nataraj. Visit your group "" on the web. New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2006 Report Share Posted April 2, 2006 Nature is.... Prakriti is.... In the sheer emptiness of dynamic space.... Empty your mind and be...... hahaha..... In this you will find........ the queen of great bliss..... Maa........ Tarini Vir Rawlley <redderred wrote: Amen to that :-D Ralph Nataraj <108 wrote: > Your piece on 'nothing but nature' is excellent but full of specious arguments -- like Satan's when he actively advocated eating of the fruit to Eve -- flawed in basic logic. You say every thing is nature. Yeah, that's true. Who is disputing that. We call it prakrti. Then you start bullcrapping God, Maa, spirituality etc. > In the same breath you want all of us live with nature, naturally etc., What do you exactly mean by living with nature. Animals live with nature, their main occupation is searching for food, mating for reproduction and dying. Do you want us to be like that. Then even writing the piece you did was unnatural. You talk of organised religions straightjacketing its practitioners. Agreed. But not spirituality. Spirituality has nothing to do with religion. Spirituality is the natural effort that swells up from deep within in quest of liberation and not straightjacketing. Are you an athiest? Are you agnostic? Are you an existentialist? These all are straightjackets in one way or the other. Either you are mistaken in your perception of what nature is or yuo are deliberately trying to mislead others. There is no cogency in your arguments other than bullcrapping god etc. Please make it clear what living in nature, living in (comm)unity etc are, how we should go abuot it so that imbeciles like me can illuminated and enlightened. Count me and Vir in sir Radhakrishnan. Ralph Nataraj. Visit your group "" on the web. New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. Traditions Divine Visit your group "" on the web. Jiyo cricket on India cricket Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.