Guest guest Posted April 6, 2006 Report Share Posted April 6, 2006 By golly, all this attention to polishing and burnishing, .... help ! I need ice !!! Devi Bhakta <devi_bhakta wrote: Kochu just pointed out that my post was terribly sexist. In addition to lingam-polishing, he correctly notes, we have no shortage of yoni-burnishing. *lol* Thank you, Kochu, for your timely correction. DB , "Devi Bhakta" <devi_bhakta wrote: > > I second Kochu's motion, though I feel incapable of seconding it in > the same melodious patois he employed. ;-) > > Though it's great to see that we've somehow racked up 277 posts in > the first six days of April, the fact that most of it consists of > lingham-polishing and pissing contests kinda sours the fun. > > Suffice it to say that intelligent and impassioned arguments exist > on all sides of the issue, and let us agree to disagree and move on. > > Many thanks. > > aim mAtangyai namaH > > > > , sankara menon <kochu1tz@> > wrote: > > > > Laidis andddd jantlemans > > > > I know its funn aind gaimes. But dis is no plaise fo dat. > > Arjuna sais dere are mistaikes in da buk. let ush discuss da buk > oik? no personal diskushion OIK? > > > > Arjuna put da naimes in disput OIK? list. > > > > Others sai what Satyananda saraswati sayed. Arjuna sai what ish > rong. Den oddars esplaine. Den da diskushion go on. No > personalities. > > > > Eef eni wan go personal me put hex of da pahsht oirder. Using > Esu Elegbra da messengar of ispirits in da woo doo. OIK? > Visit your group "" on the web. How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2006 Report Share Posted April 7, 2006 It was all worth it just to hear this said. - Devi Bhakta Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:47 PM Re: Enough Already: Kindly Take Argument Off-Board Kochu just pointed out that my post was terribly sexist. In addition to lingam-polishing, he correctly notes, we have no shortage of yoni-burnishing. *lol* Thank you, Kochu, for your timely correction. DB , "Devi Bhakta" <devi_bhakta wrote: > > I second Kochu's motion, though I feel incapable of seconding it in > the same melodious patois he employed. ;-) > > Though it's great to see that we've somehow racked up 277 posts in > the first six days of April, the fact that most of it consists of > lingham-polishing and pissing contests kinda sours the fun. > > Suffice it to say that intelligent and impassioned arguments exist > on all sides of the issue, and let us agree to disagree and move on. > > Many thanks. > > aim mAtangyai namaH > > > > , sankara menon <kochu1tz@> > wrote: > > > > Laidis andddd jantlemans > > > > I know its funn aind gaimes. But dis is no plaise fo dat. > > Arjuna sais dere are mistaikes in da buk. let ush discuss da buk > oik? no personal diskushion OIK? > > > > Arjuna put da naimes in disput OIK? list. > > > > Others sai what Satyananda saraswati sayed. Arjuna sai what ish > rong. Den oddars esplaine. Den da diskushion go on. No > personalities. > > > > Eef eni wan go personal me put hex of da pahsht oirder. Using > Esu Elegbra da messengar of ispirits in da woo doo. OIK? > -- a.. Visit your group "" on the web. b.. c.. -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.