Guest guest Posted April 6, 2006 Report Share Posted April 6, 2006 Kochu just pointed out that my post was terribly sexist. In addition to lingam-polishing, he correctly notes, we have no shortage of yoni-burnishing. *lol* Thank you, Kochu, for your timely correction. DB , "Devi Bhakta" <devi_bhakta wrote: > > I second Kochu's motion, though I feel incapable of seconding it in > the same melodious patois he employed. ;-) > > Though it's great to see that we've somehow racked up 277 posts in > the first six days of April, the fact that most of it consists of > lingham-polishing and pissing contests kinda sours the fun. > > Suffice it to say that intelligent and impassioned arguments exist > on all sides of the issue, and let us agree to disagree and move on. > > Many thanks. > > aim mAtangyai namaH > > > > , sankara menon <kochu1tz@> > wrote: > > > > Laidis andddd jantlemans > > > > I know its funn aind gaimes. But dis is no plaise fo dat. > > Arjuna sais dere are mistaikes in da buk. let ush discuss da buk > oik? no personal diskushion OIK? > > > > Arjuna put da naimes in disput OIK? list. > > > > Others sai what Satyananda saraswati sayed. Arjuna sai what ish > rong. Den oddars esplaine. Den da diskushion go on. No > personalities. > > > > Eef eni wan go personal me put hex of da pahsht oirder. Using > Esu Elegbra da messengar of ispirits in da woo doo. OIK? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.