Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Brahmacharya ... 1 (Post 7228)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Om, midnight_omboy, Blessed Self<br><br>This

Brahmacharya thread started with Post 7116 and was moving

along quite nicely.<br> <br>In your Post 7228, you

state, "...since this discussion was *spawned* within

the context of anti-gay stereotyping,...". This is

the first mention of 'gay' or any related terms or

references in the thread. So it is you who introduced an

irrelevent topic in to the thread. <br><br>I trust that you

will not see this as himsa but as merely setting the

record.<br><br>Let's move on to a new topic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Actually my post 7116, to which you refer, was in

reference to the ongoing discussion of brahmacharya, which

began with msg 7072, where brahmacharya was introduced

as a weapon in the gay-bashing festival already in

progress. <br><br>New topics may be started by anyone at

anytime. Any number of topics may be discussed

simultaneously. <br><br>Peace to all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

To be sure, message 7116 is also the best one on the brahmacharya issue I have

read so far.<br><br>Thank you so much, TLS, for sharing your insights on this

board!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Slade, you PC fool.<br>My post about bramacharya

was introduced in response to padmanow's pissy retort

to screwgee's honest admission of discomfort with

references to anal sex. KPJ's take on brahmacharya is strong

stuff, and if you define "gayness" by sexual behavior,

gee I guess he does discriminate.<br>karinnesq did

not enter this world to win any popularity contests,

but to churn the ether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

nice try. confusing the issue by changing subject headings in the middle of

offensive comments may serve to confuse the casual onlooker, your apparent

purpose. good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

<< screwgee was the one to introduce the topic of his annoyance at his

imagined sexual activity of others. >><br><br>Sorry, but isn't screwgee a

lady?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Shiny, in an haute gay world where even the

simplest abbreviations are sexually objectified, there is

no place for women.<br><br>A shivering hairless

chihuahua has been yapping and crapping on this board. #23,

please throw it a bone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Why do you, and others here such as TSlade,

consider a comment on your commment about "huge orifices"

to be perjorative? Or as Slade put it, "gay

bashing"?<br><br>Be honest now. Did you really mean your original

comments in a non-sexual way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi K<br><br>sorry im not trying to be an ingenue

but youve lost me.<br><br>im too tired for all this.

can we all just let it go and accept people is people

is. . . <br><br>. . . and what i do with my bone is

my business (oh damn, couldnt help

myself)<br><br>#23

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

<<<<<Why do you, and others here

such as TSlade, consider a comment on your commment

about "huge orifices" to be perjorative? Or as Slade

put it, "gay bashing"?>>>>><br><br>to

rephrase things to suit your current specious argument

will not resolve the

issue.<br><br><<<<<Be honest

now.>>>>><br><br>always am.

you should try it sometime. liberating. satya.

contemplate satya. <br><br><<<<<Did you really

mean your original comments in a non-sexual

way?>>>>><br><br>of course. and it was obvious. the discussion

was of

internet abbreviations, which i find deliciously nerdy. i

even said it is especially useful when the author is

disagreeable to see his or her use of "IMO" to indicate not

"in my opinion" but "in my orifice." my meaning was

clear: that any execrable opinion expressed accompanied

by "IMO" could be considered to be on par with

excretia. an offhand, lighthearted comment directed at no

one, in the context of a topic introduced by another,

and hardly offensive within the general goings on

here. <br><br>from this you and the voices in your head

went the many steps required to make the the utterly

farfetched claim that i was somehow interjecting the dreaded

"gay" topic into your otherwise gay-free mind

fluctuations. apparently you had visited my website, deduced

that i am gay, and waited for any excuse to express

your displeasure here. others with a "your team/my

team" attitude joined in, with the usual charming

epithets.<br><br>"orifice" is no more a gay word than "moolabandha," unless

of course a gay person utters it, right? rather begs

the question: even if i had deliberately introduced a

specifically gay-related topic, why should that be the cause

of accusation and vitriolic attack?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

<<<<<Shiny, in an haute gay world

where even the simplest abbreviations are sexually

objectified, there is no place for

women.>>>>><br><br>sniff. sorry he left you. the love your life,

so perfect

in every way, soft-spoken, gentle, loved to shop,

big sister with a vas deferens, and then one day

>poof< he was gone. don't judge all of us by that sad

star-crossed love affair of your youth. perhaps in a world

ruled by satya, by ashtanga yoga philosophy, where

people are allowed to grow up honestly expressing their

true nature without fear of attacks from out of the

woodwork, such tragedy could be

avoided.<br><br><<<<<A shivering hairless chihuahua has been

yapping and

crapping on this board. #23, please throw it a

bone.>>>>><br><br>but now can see why he (or any other man or

woman)

would have fled into the night. your attempted forays

into creative writing are beginning to convince me

that you are indeed the lawyer you claim to be. one

day perhaps you will place a name and a face next to

your garden variety gay-hating snipes, and join the

ranks of other proud bigots such as those on the george

bush cabinet. "crapping chihuahua" is cute, but why

must you always see everything through the prism of

your copro-/zoophilia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

<<Shiny, in an haute gay world where even

the simplest abbreviations are sexually objectified,

there is no place for women.>><br><br>If you are

referring to the infamous IMO-incident, I hope you or

anybody won't infect the board with the utterly stupid

political correctness BS (bullshit). Keep your national

problems within the US, don't spread them around

international discussion boards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

""orifice" is no more a gay word than

"moolabandha," unless of course a gay person utters it, right?

rather begs the question: even if i had deliberately

introduced a specifically gay-related topic, why should that

be the cause of accusation and vitriolic

attack?"<br><br>The evidence of the "vitriolic attack" is somewhere

in your imagination, and not found in any of posts

here.<br><br>You were the one who invoked the O word, and we all

know what you meant by it, Gay Studies Post Modernist

apologetics notwithstanding.<br><br>As I pointed out, all the

out Gay periodicals are out and out about being Out

in graphic bodily references to Gay sex. Is there

something wrong with this kind of explicit frankness? I

didn't say there was...but by your protests, you seem to

think so, the way you jumped right over "presumptious"

to "Gay basher." <br><br>I really don't have any

problem with you or anyone being gay. However, you do

seem to be a punk, which is something else entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...