Guest guest Posted May 29, 2001 Report Share Posted May 29, 2001 Something I've been wondering about: John Scott points out that Triangmukhaikapada Paschimattanasana is the counterpose to Ardha Baddha Padma Paschimattanasana, at least as far as the hips are concerned. Following that priniciple I guess Virasana would be the counterpose to Padmasana, but of course Virasana isn't in the Primary Series. Considering the large number of Padmasanas in the primary series (including finishing postures), which poses are specifically meant to be counterposes to Padmasana? Any thoughts?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Spunky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2001 Report Share Posted May 29, 2001 I'd say that Padmasana doesn't really get a counterpose in the same way that forward bends are counterposed by backbends.<br><br>But I'd agree with you that virasana (and bhekasana) are counterposes to the knee bend in padma.<br><br>Maybe you could also say that since vinyasa extends the legs, it's is a counterpose to padma (or tiriang), as in cautauranga dandasana, the legs are extended straight, UMS, straight and toes pointed, AMS, straight and foot flexed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2001 Report Share Posted May 30, 2001 I have tried doing Virasana after padmasana and I would advise against it. After the padmasana it is too much stress on the knees even though it is the counterpose, it is still working the knees. One teacher said I could do a quick virasana to help prepare for Triangmukhaikapada Paschimattanasana. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2001 Report Share Posted May 30, 2001 << Considering the large number of Padmasanas in the primary series (including finishing postures), which poses are specifically meant to be counterposes to Padmasana?<br><br>Maybe Savasana?<br><br>Tongue in cheek. Seriously, I don't think Padmasana needs any counterposes at all; however, I myself have always enjoyed it to lie down in Savasana for at least 5 minutes after a longer period sitting cross-legged in lotus. I think it's better *always* to rest in Savasana for some minutes after a longer Padmasana session, before standing up again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2001 Report Share Posted June 3, 2001 screwgee/skull, thanks for your feedback. I guess since, as John Scott also points out, one of the purposes of the Primary Series is to enable one to sit comfortably in Padmasana, it isn't thought to need to be balanced out by counterposes. My knees and hips are just taking awhile to realise that.<br><br>As for Savasana, I always take 10 minutes (I even set a timer).<br><br>Spunky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.