Guest guest Posted July 11, 2001 Report Share Posted July 11, 2001 This question has probably been answered in the vaults of this group but i'll ask it again anyway in the hope that it has been forgotten.<br><br>Ashtanga has eight-limbs. Only one of which is explicitly practised in Ashtanga classes. What about the others. Do they come along by themselves as a result of the practice (ie. is "All is coming" to be taken completely literally and is 'all' really 'all')or do they need to be cultivated separately.<br><br>Will a daily asana practice lead me to truth telling, non-violence, etc etc etc.<br><br>MrM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2001 Report Share Posted July 11, 2001 Well, people suggested various answers to your question. Some, including many ashtanga traditionalists, said that asana is the foundation of all other limbs: asana gives you the strength of body, and ultimately the steadiness of mind, to practice deeply the yamas and niyamas. Also pranayama as a separate practice was supposed to be delayed until several series have been mastered, after which control of breath would be possible.<br><br>Others, chiefly Godfrey Devereux (of the book Dynamic Yoga), say that yama/niyama is the true foundation. The proper attitude of nonviolence, combined with a sense of nonattachment and contentment, plus just the voluntary contractions that constitute the bandhas -- these elements sort of slide into asana, which sorta quiety slides into pranayama, with each limb sliding into the next on till samadhi. Then, if one continues in samadhi, liberation finally occurs. By "sliding" I mean: it happens of its own accord, and not by ones consciously willing it to happen. Devereux put it much more poetically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2001 Report Share Posted July 11, 2001 Thanks for the responses.<br><br>The understanding I'm getting here is that the asana practice is not a separate limb dangling on its own but is integrated with the others but is not constitutive of them. I've noticed that through the practice I have changed and am able to be more forgiving and can be humble enough to make apologies etc instead of sticking to my guns.<br><br>Perhaps this is just a by-product of being a stronger and more centred person and could have been achieved by working out at the gym. That would make the asana practice just another exercise with little more to recommend it. But I do feel that it is different and my changed psychology is something to do with progressing in the practice.<br><br>The question is how far you can you take the 'all is coming' mantram. Will the practice itself remove the ego and its character traits allowing us to swim in samadhi's bliss or does the practice simply reinforce the ego's conceit that it is following a 'spiritual path' as Krishnamurti suggests? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2001 Report Share Posted July 12, 2001 I believe in Krishnamurti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.