Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Meenaakshi

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

>

> T.V Puranam cannot be quoted as it is neither a

 

==> I find this attitude very puzzling.. let me ask smthg "quoted

for what ?" are u trying to "prove" or disprove smthg here ? No

offence intended..apart from the shrutis which are considered

authorless, (I say considered becos people can and have quoted

dates when these were "created") i can argue that everything else

is open to question (of course, people question what is incl. in

the Vedas too) WHO decided that the MahaPuranas, Devi Bhagavatham,

etc are genuine (anyway, what does this means ?!) I have seen

"research" work where statements like "the nAmA kAmesha baddha

mAN^galyasUtrashobhitakandharA indicates that the LS is a creation

of the smArthA brahmins becos the mangalsutra "custom" is one that

does not find mention in the Vedas (of course, not having read the

vedas, i cannot refute this) Still, even if i were to discover

that this were the case, so what ? I doubt that i will start

questioning the authenticity of the LS then.. which is why i fail

to see the point you are trying to make.. are you of the opinion

that the stories in the Periya Puranam are figments of someone's

imagination then ?

 

Sorry if i sounded acerbic, i just find this attitude puzzling

and if i may say so, with no merits..

 

Regards,

Sridhar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...