Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Meenaakshi

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

At 01:38 PM 5/31/01 -0600, you wrote:

>

> namaste ,

>

> which purana mentions the story of Devi taking birth as

>

> the daughter of pandya king in madurai?

 

 

It is found in the Thiru ViLaiyaadal PuraaNam.

The earliest T.V.PuraaNam is dated around 10th century.

The more popular one is later. There is also a Halaasya

PuraaNam or Halaasya Maahaatmyam in Sanskrit.

 

Regards

 

JayBee

>

> i am of the opinion that this story is just a creation.

>

> regards

> satish.

>

=====================

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
Guest guest

namaste ,

 

>>

>> which purana mentions the story of Devi taking birth as

>>

>> the daughter of pandya king in madurai?

>

>

> It is found in the Thiru ViLaiyaadal PuraaNam.

>The earliest T.V.PuraaNam is dated around 10th century.

>The more popular one is later. There is also a Halaasya

>PuraaNam or Halaasya Maahaatmyam in Sanskrit.

>

 

T.V Puranam cannot be quoted as it is neither a

 

Maha purana nor an Upa purana.It is just a later day composition by some

Mahaa bhakta (like most stories in Peria puranam)

Same with Haalaasya mahatmyam if it is not part of two classes

 

of puranas mentioned above.

 

However haalasya is said to be great Devi peetham in

 

Devi giita, but it does not mention the story.

 

Even Devi Bhagavatham does not mention this any where.

 

Markandeya puranam,Devi Bhagavatham,Lalitopakhyaanam,Tripura Rahasya-

mahatmya khanda etc...These are considered to be genuiine and old traditionally

 

regards

 

 

>Regards

>

>JayBee

 

 

 

Get 250 color business cards for FREE!

http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Satish Raja Arigela wrote:

>

> namaste ,

>

> >>

> >> which purana mentions the story of Devi taking birth as

> >>

> >> the daughter of pandya king in madurai?

> >

> >

> > It is found in the Thiru ViLaiyaadal PuraaNam.

> >The earliest T.V.PuraaNam is dated around 10th century.

> >The more popular one is later. There is also a Halaasya

> >PuraaNam or Halaasya Maahaatmyam in Sanskrit.

> >

>

> T.V Puranam cannot be quoted as it is neither a

>

> Maha purana nor an Upa purana.It is just a later day composition by some

> Mahaa bhakta (like most stories in Peria puranam)

> Same with Haalaasya mahatmyam if it is not part of two classes

>

> of puranas mentioned above.

>

> However haalasya is said to be great Devi peetham in

>

> Devi giita, but it does not mention the story.

>

> Even Devi Bhagavatham does not mention this any where.

>

> Markandeya puranam,Devi Bhagavatham,Lalitopakhyaanam,Tripura Rahasya-

mahatmya khanda etc...These are considered to be genuiine and old traditionally

>

>

 

Dear Satish,

 

I have been told that works like lalitophkhyaanam etc. are later day additions

etc. And all the texts you have quoted are all open to question if one is

skeptical. And even many upanishads are like that. One of my vaishhNava contacts

even questioned me the validity/authenticity of trishati bhaashhyam. I do not

get offended or ruffled (personally) by these comments though. It is quite easy

to ignore these, at least for me.

 

I did not want to jump into this controversial thread. Please bear in mind that

is mainly a devotional forum. And controversial subjects are *not*

welcome. If you believe that shankara's "malyadhvajatipasute" or agastya's

bhaje paaNDya baalam is a false understanding by these achArya-s. It is *your*

belief, and the burden of proof rests on you. Do not make a controversy out of

it here, you may want consider publishing well researched article on one of

the indological journals.

 

 

Besides, for many, tiruviLaiyaaDal puuraaNam and periya puraaNam are not mere

stories, but a narration of actual incidents that happened. Also, for most

bhakta-s besides these works and other (possible) works of nAyanmArs, shankara's

miinaaxi stotram and agastya's yoga miinaaxii stotram is more than adequate

to accept.

 

 

AUM shivaabhyaannamaH

 

parandhAma rUpaaM bhaje paaNDya baalam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...