shrImUkapa~nchashatI (3.28 - 3.30)

[Guest guest]

... shrIkAraNaparachidrUpAyai namaH ..

 

janani bhuvane chaN^kamye.aha.n (*) kiyantamanehasa.n

kupuruShakarabhraShTairduShTairdhanairudara.nbhariH .

taruNakaruNe tandrAshUnye taraN^gaya lochane

namati mayi te ki.nchitkA~nchIpurImaNidIpike .. 28 ..

 

(*) needs to be verified, unclear in text

 

munijanamanaHpeTIratna.n sphuratkaruNAnaTI\-

viharaNakalAgeha.n kA~nchIpurImaNibhUShaNam .

jagati mahato mohavyAdhernR^iNA.n paramauShadha.n

puraharadR^ishA.n sAphalya.n me puraH parijR^imbhatAm .. 29 ..

 

munijanamodhAmne dhAmne vachomayajAhnavI\-

himagiritaTaprAgbhArAyAkSharAya parAtmane .

viharaNajuShe kA~nchIdeshe maheshvaralochana\-

tritayasarasakrIDAsaudhAN^gaNAya namo namaH .. 30 ..

[Guest guest]

, "Aarathi Sankaran" <aarathisankaran> wrote:

>

> janani bhuvane chaN^kamye.aha.n (*) kiyantamanehasa.n

>

> (*) needs to be verified, unclear in text

>

> The text I have says "chaN^kamyeham" which is split as chaN^kamye +

aham

>

> HTH

> Regards

> Aarathi.

 

Namaste,

 

Another way of looking at it may be:

 

The sandhi split for chaN^kamyeham would be chaN^kami + eham [?enam]

 

for chaN^kamye.aham " chaN^kamye + aham [with

the avagraha .a (S)]

 

 

Regards,

 

s.

[Guest guest]

Namaste,

 

I am also wondering if the word should be

chaN^kramye.aham! [i did not find chaN^kamye in the dictionary].

 

Regards,

 

s.

 

 

 

, sunderh@h... wrote:

> , "Aarathi Sankaran" <aarathisankaran>

wrote:

> >

> > janani bhuvane chaN^kamye.aha.n (*) kiyantamanehasa.n

> >

> > (*) needs to be verified, unclear in text

> >

> > The text I have says "chaN^kamyeham" which is split as chaN^kamye

+

> aham

> >

> > HTH

> > Regards

> > Aarathi.

>

> Namaste,

>

> Another way of looking at it may be:

>

> The sandhi split for chaN^kamyeham would be chaN^kami + eham

[?enam]

>

> for chaN^kamye.aham " chaN^kamye + aham

[with

> the avagraha .a (S)]

>

>

> Regards,

>

> s.