Guest guest Posted December 21, 2001 Report Share Posted December 21, 2001 Shyamala or Raja Matangi was created by Lalitha from HER sugar cane bow during HER battle w/ Bandasura. SHE represents the mind and its activities. 'Vishanga', who represents the mind that does not want sanga was killed by HER. She has eight arms holding: paddy-past karmas, lotus -mind in worldly activity, paasha -love, ankusa-anger, japa mala and books - knowledge, and the veena - yoga. Her right foot is down indicating must do sadhana in the world by looking at her manifestation. Her mula mantra consist of 98 letters and if one chants it 108 times a day for 12 years one gains the power of attraction. This is a summary of information from my Guru, it seemed appropriate to share as she is a current topic of discussion in the group, photo attached. I do not feel comfortable sharing the mula mantra with the group but it can easily be found. Colin www.srichakrayoga.com Check out Shopping and Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at or bid at http://auctions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2001 Report Share Posted December 27, 2001 I am still trying to get my head around the total conception of Maatangi Devi (to the extent that this is possible using merely the intellect). In looking at recent posts and back through the archives, it appears that She has two principle roles: (1) as a major aspect of Meenakshi; and (2) as the ninth of the Ten Mahavidyas. In his detailed study of the Mahavidyas, David Kinsley skimmed over Maatangi to some extent, giving Her considerably less analysis than the other goddesses of that group. He offered up an early, Buddhist origin myth; then spent the rest of his discussion concentrating on Her role as the Outcaste Goddess, i.e. Uccista Chandalini. He did not comment on Her role as a Tantric form of Saraswati (the former's pollution being the "flip side" of the latter's purity, etc). Nor did he mention Her connection to Meenakshi Devi. The music/arts connection, obviously, provides one good bridge from the "Tantric Saraswati" Maatangi of the Ten Mahavidyas, to the Meenakshi Maatangi of Madurai. As does Her role as manifest speech itself -- i.e. the "pollution" of pure, unspoken speech? But how does this knowledge/arts/speech connection relate to Dr. Sadagopam's note that She is invoked for establishing the reign of peace and prosperity? Or her Tantric role is the power of domination? How does Her "Raja" form relate to Her outcaste form? Or does it? And finally, there are Her many names -- do these different names denote fundamentally different conceptions of the Goddess? For example, as an aspect of Meenakshi, we see Maatangi referred to as Laghushyama, Shyaamala, Raja Shyaamala, and Moha Raathri. Aravind Krishna, in this Group, notes that "The naamaas Shyaamalaa, Maatangi and Miinakshi represent the same deity." Is it that simple? Are they just different names without denoting any real difference in the understanding of the Deity? And as one of the Ten Mahavidyas, a similar "name game" emerges: I've seen Her referred to as Ucchista-Maatangi, Ucchista-Chandalini, Raja Maatangi, Sumukhi-Maatangi, Vasya-Maatangi, and Karna-Maatangi. And then there are her Buddhist forms -- I've seen Her related to Shoshika; and now Kalika Putra notes Her relation to Neela Saraswati as well. Can anyone here pull all of these diverse conceptions together? Or is Her diversity the whole point? Has anyone here ever seen a copy of the Maatangi Tantra referenced by Dr. Sadagopan? Any and all information and/or clarification will be much appreciated! Aum Maatangyai Namaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matangisharna Posted May 2, 2012 Report Share Posted May 2, 2012 two of her other aspects are jeyshtha matangi devi and laghu shyama devi she is also mantrini to Lalita devi [her chief advisor / councellor] I am still trying to get my head around the total conception ofMaatangi Devi (to the extent that this is possible using merely the intellect). In looking at recent posts and back through the archives, it appears that She has two principle roles: (1) as a major aspect of Meenakshi; and (2) as the ninth of the Ten Mahavidyas. In his detailed study of the Mahavidyas, David Kinsley skimmed over Maatangi to some extent, giving Her considerably less analysis than the other goddesses of that group. He offered up an early, Buddhist origin myth; then spent the rest of his discussion concentrating on Her role as the Outcaste Goddess, i.e. Uccista Chandalini. He did not comment on Her role as a Tantric form of Saraswati (the former's pollution being the "flip side" of the latter's purity, etc). Nor did he mention Her connection to Meenakshi Devi. The music/arts connection, obviously, provides one good bridge from the "Tantric Saraswati" Maatangi of the Ten Mahavidyas, to the Meenakshi Maatangi of Madurai. As does Her role as manifest speech itself -- i.e. the "pollution" of pure, unspoken speech? But how does this knowledge/arts/speech connection relate to Dr. Sadagopam's note that She is invoked for establishing the reign of peace and prosperity? Or her Tantric role is the power of domination? How does Her "Raja" form relate to Her outcaste form? Or does it? And finally, there are Her many names -- do these different names denote fundamentally different conceptions of the Goddess? For example, as an aspect of Meenakshi, we see Maatangi referred to as Laghushyama, Shyaamala, Raja Shyaamala, and Moha Raathri. Aravind Krishna, in this Group, notes that "The naamaas Shyaamalaa, Maatangi and Miinakshi represent the same deity." Is it that simple? Are they just different names without denoting any real difference in the understanding of the Deity? And as one of the Ten Mahavidyas, a similar "name game" emerges: I've seen Her referred to as Ucchista-Maatangi, Ucchista-Chandalini, Raja Maatangi, Sumukhi-Maatangi, Vasya-Maatangi, and Karna-Maatangi. And then there are her Buddhist forms -- I've seen Her related to Shoshika; and now Kalika Putra notes Her relation to Neela Saraswati as well. Can anyone here pull all of these diverse conceptions together? Or is Her diversity the whole point? Has anyone here ever seen a copy of the Maatangi Tantra referenced by Dr. Sadagopan? Any and all information and/or clarification will be much appreciated! Aum Maatangyai Namaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.