Guest guest Posted January 23, 2003 Report Share Posted January 23, 2003 , L Vaidyanathan <vyagrapurielvi> wrote: > > Come on, now let me ask you a question. Sri Raja > Mathangi Navarathri is approaching. Members, please > come forward and give some special info/news about it. > Sri Meenakshi is Raja Mathangi, Raja Shyamala, Suka > Shyama; She is the Minister (Prime) in the Sundhari > Rajya, while Dandini (Varaahi - Akilandeswari, > Tiruvaikkovil)is Defence Minister. Likewise, in Sri > Sundhari's cabinet Annapoorna is Food Minister, Baala > - Education portfolio?. > > Regards, > L Vaidyanathan > - The four navarAtri-s are respectively in the months chaitra, aashhaaDha, aashvina, and mAgha. They start on shukla paxa prathama thithi and end in navami. The dates are fixed based on the chandramAna calendar. And it is better to remember it that way. - The chaitra and aashivina navarAtri-s are famous and also known by the their season, that is, vasanta and shArada navarAtri-s (after vasanta and sharad R^itavaH). And these two navarAtri-s are important according devii bhaagavatam. - devii bhavagavatam which talks about these four navarAtri-s do not make any specific link to vArAhi, mAtangi, etc. The procedure it outlines is same for all. - AFAIK, (some) shrIvidyopAsaka-s associate vasanta navarAtri with rAja mAtangI AshhADha navarAtri with vArAhI shArAda navarAtri with lalitA I dont know what they associate with mAgha navarAtri, going by logic, it should be ashvArUDHa. - The last navarAtri of this year (chitrabhAnu, not 2003) is the mAgha navarAtri. This month starts on Feb 2, 2003 by western calendar. This navarAtri is sometimes wrongly referred to as Maha navaratrI. That is basically the confusion in correctly transliterating the name of the month. mAgha mAsa is the chandramaana month in which moon is in magha naxatra during puurNima. - First navarAtri of next year (subhAnu) is on April 2, 2003 when the chaitra mAsa begins. These dates you have to verify with your local panchangam. - Personally, I do not distinguish these navarAtri-s based as some shriividyopasaka-s do. To me they are all the same. yo.ahamasmiiti vA sohamasmiiti vA yo.asau so.ahamasmiiti vA yA bhAvyate saishhA shhoDashii shriividyA pa~nchadashAksharii shriimahAtripurasundarii bAlAMbiketi bagaleti vA mAta.ngiiti svayaMvarakalyANiiti bhuvaneshvariiti chAmuNDeti chaNDeti vArAhiiti tiraskariNiiti rAjamAta.ngiiti vA shukashyAmaleti vA laghushyaamaleti vA ashvArUDheti vA pratya.ngirA dhuumAvatii sAvitrii gAyatrii sarasvatii brahmAnandakaleti || 8|| -As far as observance, if you are as ignorant as I am, it is better to keep it simple and focus more bhakti and sharaNagati. To do something elaborate, your certainly have to many qualifications and guidance. My 2c. Ravi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.