Fwd: Re:Bhuvaneshwari Kalpa

[Guest guest]

> --- harsha_ramamurthy <harsha_ramamurthy

> wrote:

> > Mon, 24 May 2004 06:59:20 -0000

> > "harsha_ramamurthy"

> > <harsha_ramamurthy

> > satisharigela

> > Re:Bhuvaneshwari Kalpa

> >

> > || ShivAdi gurubhyo namaH ||

> >

> > There could be many Bhuvaneshwari Kalpas, but there

> > is one I have

> > come across. This is a part of Rudrayamala again

> > (Sri

> > Punyanandanatha, the famous Bengali scholar mentions

> > that

> > Bhuvaneshwari Kalpa is a section of Rudrayamala in

> > one of his

> > Bhashyas). Mahatripurasundari Rahasya Hridaya, which

> > details the

> > Srichakra Navavarana Pooja closely on the lines of

> > Parashurama

> > Kalpasutra, is said to be from Bhuvaneshwari Kalpa

> > of Rudrayamala

> > (this is mentioned in a publication of the Hridaya

> > by Balamanorama

> > Press and a manuscript that was being used by Sri

> > Amritananda Yogi,

> > the direct disciple of Sri Chidanandanatha

> > (Brahmasri Subrahmanya

> > Iyer). The authencity of this claim has to be

> > verified. Also, I

> > obtained a copy of Bhuvaneshwari Kalpa by late Sri

> > Yajnanarayana

> > Shastrigal, a disciple of Sri Kalyanananda Bharati

> > of Guntur, Andhra

> > Pradesh. This is an incomplete version, which

> > describes ritualistic

> > application of mantras like Bhuvaneshwari, Tvarita,

> > Saubhagya Vidya,

> > Shuddha Shodashi, Mahashodashi, Parashodashi,

> > Manvadi Lopamudradi

> > Bhedas of Srividya with different Rishyadi nyasas

> > and Dhyanas,

> > Kameshwara etc and deals with some related Kavachas

> > and Hridayas and

> > Stutis. However, the Hridaya mentioned above is not

> > a part of this

> > copy and hence I assume it is incomplete! The

> > version I have makes no

> > reference to Vama/Kaula practices but is certainly

> > in line with works

> > like Kalpasutra. There could also be other works

> > named Bhuvaneshwari

> > Kalpa. But the one I mentioned is certainly Tantric

> > in nature. If

> > authorship of Lalita Trishati Bhashyam is ascribed

> > to AcharyapadaH,

> > it is doubtful that he qoutes from this Kalpa

> > because: 1. It is a

> > part of Yamala, 2. It is closely in line with

> > Parashurama Kalpasutra.

> >

> > There are also many Kalpas and Samhitas said to be a

> > part of Atharva

> > Veda (like the Saubhagya Kanda portion), but these

> > do not actually

> > appear to be a part of the Veda at all! So it is

> > again doubtful if

> > Srimadacharya has qouted from one of these Kalpas,

> > which are recent

> > additions to the fourth Veda. Some other members

> > should be able to

> > throw more light on any other version of

> > Bhuvaneshwari Kalpa, if

> > available.

> >

> > Srimatre namaH.

> >

> >

> >

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Messenger.

http://messenger./