Guest guest Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 I have had a doubt for sometime. Will somone give some explanation? There are two namas in LS. "Vishukra praanaharana vaaraahI vIryananditA" and "Mantrinyambaa viracita viShanga vadha toShitA" but, according to the puranas dealing with Lalita; it was Mantrini who killed Vishukra and Vaaraahi who killed Vishanga. Am I right? If so why this "mistake"? I am sure this is no "mistake". (The mistake must be in my understanding) because great commentators like Bhaskararaya have not commented on this. Or IF my understanding is right, will someone explain why this exchange in roles? sri parasukhananda nadha <sriparasukhanandanadha wrote: Sub: Chidagni kunda sambhoota AdaranEya mahAsayAh, Om chidagni kunda sambhootayai namah. In the beginning (of course that was not ever there) when by that time, the three gunAs, sattwa, rajas and thamas were not yet separated, only the Siva was existing as a nonexistent subject. He was then a nameless and formless one and just a sthAnu swaroopa only. In fact he is all knowing sarvajna and all powerful sarvasakthimAn. Among all other sakthis, the chitchakthi occupies the prominent and eternally inseparable status in/with him. She flashed a feeling of I`ness (aham) into Siva`s memory and by that, Siva was subjected to have a desire for something else as a company. "SivaparAyai namah" ======================================================= devi prasIda paripAlaya no.aribhiiter nityaM yathAsuravadhAdadhunaiva sadyaH | pApAni sarvajagatAM prashamaM nayAshu utpAtapAkajanitA.nshcha mahopasargAn.h || Be informed, visit: http://www.kanchi-sathya.org/ ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.