Guest guest Posted March 18, 2006 Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 -- sriparasukhanandanatha Date :-- March 18, 2006 Subject:-- muKam bindum kritwa SrigurussarvakAraNaBhUtA Saktih | SrimahAgaNAdhipataye namah || “muKam bindum kR~itwA kucayugam adhastasya tadadho harArTam dhyAyEdyO haramahiShi tE manmadha kalAm | sa sadyah sanKsOBham nayati vanitA ityati laGu trilOkImapyASu Bhramayati ravIndu stanayugAm ||” Outward meaning in a summary is – “Imagine ‘bindu’ as the face of the woman; the ‘duel bindus’ as the breasts of her, and beneath these three, which is there as a trigon to be the vagina of that woman and meditate manmadha kalA in it: by that, when the natives of all the three worlds are mesmerized and subjected to illusions, what to say about the agitation and turmoil in the common woman folks?” This nineteenth Sloka in saundaryalahari of Sri Sankara BhagavatpAdAcarya is narrated to be useful for inducing lustful nymphomania in women folks and attract them to his side with the help of the mantra Sakti, secretly studded in it, (by almost all the commentators so far as to my knowledge goes). Didn`t you ever feel it quite awesome, unnatural and undesirable any way? The narrator is the guru of all gurus and the jagadguru, an unmarried brahmacari, who has relinquished all the worldly pleasures; and the listener is a SiShya who wants to relinquish every thing in quest of salvation, approached the guru for proper guidance in showing him a right path for the liberation. Just think of the absurdity in these commentaries now please. Then let us try to find out if there is any other meaning which can reveal the real intention of the jagadguru. “nityA kUta trayam dEvi turiiya swara SeKaram | tatturiiyam swarUpanca bindutrayam udiiritam || tadAtmakamca dEvyaste sadhakasya ca yadBhavEt | tad BhAvanAm sR~inu prAj~nyE mahOdayakariim SuBhAm || Urdhwa bindwAtmakam vaktram adhO bindu dwayAtmakam | Kucadwayam tu tatChEShA gati mEtam viBhAvayEt ||” This is the description given in the kAdimata tantram for the “kAmakalA”. The fourth alphabet “iimkAra” which is heard at the conclusion of the three kUtAs, in the ‘nAda’ and ‘nAdAnta’ itself is this ‘mahAmAyA’. It means The sole witness for the existence of avasthA traya and also to the non-existence of the avasthAtraya. “kUta trayE mahAdEvi kunDalI tritayEpi ca cakrANAm pUrva pUrvEShAm nAdarUpENa yOjanam ||” This indicates the procedure in doing ‘japa’, how we should have to bind up the three kUtas of the mantra with the kundalini which remains spread in all the sthUla, sUxma and parA forms. From the centre of the forehead nine fingers upwards upto the brahma_randhra with nine names as, bindu, artha_candra, rOdhini, nAda, nAdAnta, Sakti, vyApika, samana and unmani. We have to fix up the letters of our mantra, along with this three types of kundalini and merge with all these nine nAdAs at the rear end of the mantra.. Also, there is another type of meditation was mentioned to meditate upon the face of the dEvata in the bindusthAna of our forehead, above of it, in the place where it was said as the place of ‘nAdA’, the ‘visarga’ (duel bindu) just above the margins of hair the two breasts which fed us for growth; and the triangle in the place of ‘brahma_randhra’ as the ‘yOni’ the mother`s womb where we all took birth from. The three of the mantra kUtAs should be attached in these three places and imagine that the alphabets of the mantra are passing through these three parts of the ‘kAmakala’, entering in to the birth place from where the whole of the universe did emerge out and from there we reach our real abode. This method of meditation is called the “samhAra karma”. This is in accordance with the ‘sanatkumara samhita’. “trikOnE baindava sthAnE adhOvaktram vicintayEt | bindOr upri BhAgE tu vaktram paricintya sAdhkah || taduparyEva vaxOja dwitayam samsmarEd budhah | taduparyEva yOni ca kramaSO BhuvanESwariim || SriividyAm kAmarajan ca vinyasyASu vimOhayEt | There is also another method of this meditation.in the reverse order in the name of “sR~iShti karma” “EkAm prakR~iti rUpENa sarva Saktim vicintayEt | kAmayEt kAminiim sarvAm dEvIm AvarNa rUpiNIm || cintayEt sundarIm dEvIm sarva vyApaka rUpiNIm | ikAraBhUta mantrasyAvayavam ca catuShTayam || bindu trayasya dEvESi pratham dEveShkakaviduh | bindu dwayam stana dwandwam hR~idi sthAnE niyOjayEt || hakArArtham kalAm sUxmAm yOni madhyE vicintayEt || udyadAditya sankASam sindUrABham stana dwayam | bindum sankalpya vaktram tu sPuraddiipa SiKa praBham || kAmO binduraham dEvi tatrasthA paramESwarI | Siva Sakti mayam dEva tadadhastad kucadwayam || Tadadhah saparArdham tu cidrUpam paramAm kalAm | Sancintya sAdhaka SrEShTa strailOkyam vaSamAnayEt || Etat tE kathitam dEvi kAma kalA su nirNayam | gOptavyantu prayatnEna yadIChEdatmanO hitam || This kind of meditation will be useful to acquire worldly pleasures, because you are coming down into the universe to live in it. This kAma_kala is said to be the mahAmAyA Sakti of paramEswara. That is why sri Jagadguru is giving a warning not to enter into the mAyA saying that “sa sadyah sanxObham nayati vanitA ityati laGu” Here vanitA should not be taken as ladies. “vanita” according to the definitions given in the amarakOSa as “vanyata iti vanitA – vanu yAcanE; vana ShaNa samBhaktau”. It means what ever you ask for your.meterial pleasures and fruition or enjoyment, she will give every thing you ask and put you in a confused state that you are immersed in it only. “Bhramayati ravIndu stanayugAm” The word “raviindu stana yugAm” also indicates “agnii ShOmAtmakam jagat” (there is no difference between the Sun and the fire in vEdAs.) Summarily, it will deceive the jagat immercing it in delusion. Every one who wish to know the ;swaswarUpa; (his own self) , would crave to dwell upon that turIya avastha (this bindu, visarga and trikOna) in the brahma_randhra only. That is why it is called “kAma_kalA” Please excuse me if I have exceeded any limits. krishnarao .. krishnarao.lanka (sriparasukhanandanadha) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2006 Report Share Posted March 20, 2006 OM SrIgurussarvakAraNa BUtA SaktiH. OM SrIman mahA gaNAdhipatayE namaH. I am also the one, with your concern. But, I am not the one, that has been gone. I see, they all say about the only one. when that one talks about that only one. What harm should I see, and to whom? Thus I took off my feelings and keep mum. also please see my other post in the group: /message/8446 Dr. BN Pandit giving you subtle interpretation to you. SrIparasukhAnanda nAtha giving subtle interpretation to group members. If I am in your shoes, how would I think that Ambaa-l group memebers are not as deserving much as I am on SrImAtha? By the way, are these subtle interpretations (of SrI BN Padit and of SrIparasukhAnanda nAthA's) are dead-ends?They are so complete that one should stop there? Please take all commentaries with pinch of salt.And... move on. Thus The Lord God intended, let the knowledge flow, unbounded. OM aiM hrIM SrIM SrIsAxI caitnya svarUpAtmane namOnnamaH SrIM. prasAda. , virendra qazi <virendraqazi wrote: > > Respected teachers and guides, > > Normally we avoid sharing or commenting on net regarding this sacred and secret knowledge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.