Quarrel with saivites

[Guest guest]

Questioning our aachaaryaas:

 

As Krishna pointed out, as sri vasihnavaas

we must follow certain protocol while seeking

clarifications from our aachaaryaas. To my

knowledge blind faith is not advocated across

the board for everyone. Some great souls

have opted for just that. E.g. dhEvu maRRariyEn

of madhurakavi aazhvaar. Others have not hesitated

to question when appropriate. Kooraththaazhvaar's

devotion to sri raamaaanuja is unquestonable, yet

yet he refused to write on when some of

Sri Raamaanujaa's commentary was not to

his liking! Ramanuja himself refused to accept

Yadavaprakasar's teachings.

 

 

Quarrel with saivites:

The post I made was not intended for initiating a

quarrel. (I know Mani is not saying I did, this is

just to make sure there are no misunderstandings)

If that was my intention I would have

posted it in a different forum. I shared the

question that bothered me and the answer I found

in sri azhagiya singar's writings. Sri azhagiya singar

himself was responding to somebody else's claims.

Therefore, there is no quarrel with saivites.

 

The point of my post was for sri vaishnavites to not

get confused, like I did, with the term Isvara as used

for Sivan; the point was not to quarrel with saivites.

 

 

-- Dileepan