Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Why do I need an acarya? VERY LONG

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Here is an article about the need for approaching an

acarya. This appeared in the current issue of Sri

Nrisimhapriya, October 95. The Bhakthi/Prapatti

exchanges prompts me to post this rather long article. I

hope it is not too much of a burden on the resources.

 

If you wish to to the monthly please contact

 

Sri Nrisimha Priya

66 Dr. Rangachari Road

Madras 600 018, INDIA

 

-- Dileepan

 

==========================================================

Acarya Samasrayam Resorting the Preceptor

By Dr. S. Padmanabhan, Devanarvilagam

 

T = Teacher Sudarsan

P = Pupil Subandhu

 

T: WELCOME

 

P: Many salutations to you Sir!

 

T: Where are you residing now?

 

P: I dwell now in the Northern part of the country.

 

T: I learnt that you are holding a high position. I am

indeed very happy. Do you have an opportunity to

study our traditional texts? Do you find time for that?

 

P: Whenever I find some time, I read those texts.

 

T: Is there any learned person there in your place to

instruct you traditionally?

 

P: There is no such person in my place. Yet, I have leant

Sanskrit during my school days and I have a good

knowledge of it. I have good acquaintance with logic

(Tarka,) grammar (Vyakarana.) Hence I could read

and comprehend any text.

 

T: What are the texts you read during your leisure time?

 

P: I read the Ramanujabhashya, Rahasyatrayasara,

Ramanuja's commentary [meaning] on the Gita, and

the meaning of Tiruvaymozhi whenever I, find time.

 

T: Alas!

 

P: Sir, why this interjection of pity?

 

T: The difficulty is that you are unable to name the texts

properly and yet you claim that you have learnt the

meaning of those texts clearly.

 

P: I told the names of the text which are known as the

Granthacatustaya (the four sacred texts.) Did I not?

 

T: Those who have studied tradition at all will not say

like this.

 

P: Then how do they name them?

 

T: They would denote them as Srimad Bhashyam, Srimad

Rahasyatrayasaram, Srimad Gitabhashyam, and Sri

Bhagavadvisayam.

 

P: What a notion! If they are not denoted like this, does it

mean that the meaning of those texts wouldn't become

clear?

 

T: Yes, indeed. The true import will not become clear.

One has to resort to a preceptor and comprehend the

true import.

 

P: So, it means, for this purpose, I must go in search of a

person. Whenever I am free, the teacher must find

time (to teach me). Being aware of my commitment

he must be present well in advance. In case, he could

not come on a specific day, my precious time would be

wasted. Suppose I say that there is no time on the

specified day, he should not think otherwise.

Moreover, I do not know, what he would demand to

teach all these. Knowing my position and my income,

he may expect much. He must understand that I read

only to spend my time. In order to avoid all these

inconveniences and difficulties I read all these texts

myself whenever I am free. Hence I don't require

anybody's help.

 

T: All these statements of yours are silly and nonsensical.

It is because of the arrogant and egoistic nature caused

by your status. If you further harbor such thoughts

you will be ruined. You will not attain liberation.

 

P: Why have you become so furious? If I have said

anything (provocative) kindly excuse me. Hope I have

not insulted you!

 

T: Sure, you have not insulted me. Yet, you speak

without any discrimination. Let me explain.

 

P: Sir, I shall listen to your advice attentively.

 

T: Subandu! In order that a man may adopt the righteous

path and attain liberation the association of an acarya

(preceptor) is essential. Therefore, you will have to

choose acarya.

 

P: Sir, in order that a person may adopt the righteous

path, is it not enough to read good books? Is it

necessary that one should approach an acarya for this

purpose?

 

T: I agree with you. But one should know as to what are

the books to be read and what are the ones to be

discarded. In the beginning of the Mahasiddhanta

section of the Jinjnasadhikarana of the Srimad

Bhashya, Yatiraja (Sri Ramanuja) states that the

learned should pay no attention to the statements of

persons, who are not given to the true import of the

Vedas. While commenting on the word Anadaraniya

in the context under reference, Sri Srutaprakasikacarya

says that even to understand the siddhanta view (that

is, the final view of one's own system) one should not

clearly explain and study the prefatory texts. Hence

we should know, in the first place, as to what are the

essential and important texts that should be read. All

the things we have known are not good. We might

have acquired the knowledge of a good thing and, it

may not yield undesirable results. Yet, it does not

mean that we have had a desirable result.

 

P: Sir, what are the things that should be known?

 

T: Tattvam (reality), Hitam (means) and Purushartham

(the goal) are the three essentials that should be

known.

 

P: Sir, what is Tattva, what is Hita and what is

Purushartha?

 

T: It cannot be revealed in the course of a mere

conversation. You will have to approach an ideal

acarya, (preceptor sadacarya) who has come in the

linage of satsampradaya (right tradition) with due

respect and then learn it.

 

P: Swamin! I am unable to understand what you have

said. What is satsampradaya? Who is a sadacarya?

 

T: The sampradaya (tradition) beginning from Bhagavan

and culminating in the acarya whom you are resorting

to, and which has been instructed accordingly through

specific persons is known as satsampradaya. A

sadacarya (ideal preceptor) is one who has a firm faith

in such a satsampradaya, who hails from a virtuous

family, without doing sinful acts, who has controlled

his sense organs, who has realized the Supreme Being,

who is devoid of jealousy, pomp and show, and who is

affectionate towards his disciples as he is attached to

his relatives.

 

P: Swamin! It really confuses me further. If I want to

invite a person and listen the lectures from him, you

say that he must be a sadacarya who has come in the

satsampradaya whom I should really search for?

 

T: Subandu! You cannot attain an acarya so easily. It

requires six prerequisites for the attainment. If these

are fulfilled, then a sadacarya may be obtained.

 

P: Six prerequisites! Sir, what are they?

 

T: Yes, let me explain. They are: 1. Lord's Mercy, 2.

Merit acquired accidentally, 3. Grace of Lord Visnu

4. Being without aversion towards Lord Visnu,

5. Listening to the anectodes of Lord Visnu, and

6. the conversation with noble souls. These are

conditions for a person to attain a sadacarya.

 

P: I am happy. Among these six, I believe that I have

the first five. I am able to obtain the sixth one namely

conversation with noble persons, to-day only, by your

association. Hereafter, I think, I have become

fortunate to attain an acarya. Holy one You alone

should arrange (fix) me an acarya and request him to

visit my residence daily. I shall pay him accordingly.

 

T: The acarya will not come in search of you. It is only

you, who should go in search of the acarya. When you

go to a temple or to meet acarya you should not go

with an empty hand. You should present him with

fruits, coconuts or any desirable objects according to

your capacity and request him with folded hands, "Sir,

I have become your disciple. You will have to protect

me and bless me. I have surrendered unto you". The

great Arjuna surrendered unto Lord Krsna only thus.

Hence, it is you who should go to the place of the

acarya.

 

P: How much would the acarya demand to teach the

texts?

 

T: Please don't say that he must teach the texts. You

should say instruct or initiate [upadesa], or delivering

[sadikka] Kalaksepa. The acarya will test you in

various ways. Just for the sake of name and fame or

for any material benefits he will not instruct you.

Furthermore becoming elated on the ground that a

disciple has come to him, if he instructs any traditional

secrets, without really testing, the acarya incurs the sin

of the disciple. For instance, Brahma instructed Indra,

without really testing him, and unaware of what would

be the dire consequences. As a result he forgot the

Brahma-vidya instruction he had received. Later, the

Lord, taught that Brahmavidya, through Narada out of

compassion. Therefore, only after testing he would

initiate you. The duty of an acarya, according to the

sacred scriptures, is to instruct the disciples with

compassion. Therefore, I am sure, he will not demand

any money from you.

 

P: You said that he would test me. Does it mean that he

would test me in sastras?

 

T: No, definitely not. He will test you as to whether he

could instruct you the true import of Vedanta and

whether you are really desirous and have the capacity

to know and comprehend it. So he might ask you to

come day after day. In case, the disciple is very

young, he would ask him to do small house-hold

chores. These are the probable tests.

 

P: What should I do?

 

T: In order that the instructions of the acarya may become

very clear, one has to rend service to the preceptor. Or

we may give him substantial money. All these, would

be know from the conversation of Janasruti and sage

Raikva.

 

P: Even after such a long conversation, I have some

doubts. Kindly, Sir, clarify those doubts too. After

attaining an acarya with such difficulties, he is going

to instruct only what is there in the book. Is it not? I

have with me the Srimad Rahasyatrayas of Swami Sri

Vedanta Desika and also the commentaries thereon,

that are published so far. Also I possess a lucid

English translation of the text. While myself can

understand from these books, should I approach an

acraya essentially for this?

 

T: You should note that in the Srimad Rahasya

Trayasara, which you have referred to now, it is stated

that one should resort to an acarya. Sastras which are

terse and difficult to understand would only confuse

one's intellect. Hence. if you approach an acraya he

would instruct that truth which is not required to be

elaborated and that truth which requires an explanation

without contracting it. On the contrary, if one comes.

to know the meaning accidentally, or secretly or under

some pretext or by studying on one's own, it would

become futile. Also it should be noticed that it would

yield undesirable results. Hence it is very essential

that one should receive the instruction and initiation

from the acraya only. In the books it could be noticed

that mantras like Astaksara, Dvaya and Caramasloka

are printed. Their greatness too has been explained

elaborately. With the help of these books, we should

memorize these mantras and meditate on them. They

not only would yield the desired results but also would

yield counter results. The astaksara mantra has certain

accent (or note) for its pronunciation. It has certain

gestures to be followed. All these should be initiated

into, only through an acarya. If they are spelt with

discordant note (accent) it would end in undesirable

results. Once, a demon by name Tyasta performed a

sacrifice by which he wanted to create an enemy who

could kill Indra, the King of gods. But while

performing the sacrifice, he spelt the mantra on a

discordant note which meant that he got an enemy

who could be killed by Indra, and accordingly that

enemy was slain by Indra. Hence persons of

discriminating mind should not think that they have

understood the meaning of a particular text or mantra

by merely reading it. This being the difficulty of the

text, how is it possible to know the inner or secret

meanings which are known only through tradition? In

the Sampradaya Parisuddhi section, Swami Desikan

has clearly stated that determining the meaning of a

passage or text which has been handed down

traditionally, with the help of sastras is impossible.

Even if it is understood easily with the help of sastras

that is, without receiving it from the acarya it is

useless. Further, listen carefully.

 

Sri Alavandar even in his boyhood languished one

Akkilazhvan in a debate with the help of Sastric

knowledge. And he (Sri Alavandar) proclaimed that

there is no scholar equal to him. Yet, a person of his

calibre resorted to an acarya in Manakkal Nambi and

got initiated into the true meanings of the tradition.

 

Yatiraja (Sri Ramanuja), after criticizing and rejecting

the several interpretations and meanings of

Yadavaprakasa, (when he was a student under him) on

the command of Lord Varadaraja resorted to

Periyanambi and did Kalaksepa.

 

Our acarya Sarvabhauma Sri Vedantadesika, had the

genius, even at the very young age of five, to point out

the context in the Sribhasya that was left off and

forgotten in the traditional discourse of Sri Nadadur

Ammal. Yet, did not he resort to an acarya in his

uncle to learn the sastras? Did he not state this

gleefully in his books?

 

If you further have any doubts in this matter, even the

God who created you cannot satisfy and answer you.

 

P: Kindly pardon me. I have clearly understood that only

by resorting to an acarya I can have the right

knowledge and get liberated. Why one should resort

to an acarya? Is it not enough if we sing the name and

glory of the Lord, in this Kaliyuga?

 

T: Whether one is a sinner or a virtuous person it is only

through the association with an acarya one can attain

liberation. Ksatrabandhu, a noted sinner attained

liberation only through the association with an acraya.

His sins were not counter productive. Pundarika too,

the virtuous soul, attained liberation only through the

association with acarya. His virtues and merits did not

help him in this. Therefore, without the association

with an acarya there will be no liberation.

 

Some books of admitted validity state that liberation

(moksa) could be obtained by singing the name and

glory of the Lord. Some declare it is attained by either

bhakti or prapatti. In the Bhagavad Gita the Lord

says that to attain liberation, it is enough if one

meditates upon the secret as to why the Lord has

incarnated in the mortal world. Another one holds the

view that there will be no liberation for who has no

sons (progeny). All these statements should be

explained satisfactorily, without contradicting each

other. Please, express your view on this.

 

P: (In all humility) Sir, what do I know? You yourself,

please, clarify.

 

T: Singing the name and glory etc. would lead to moksa

only through Prapatti [self - surrender]. Don't

misunderstand all these concepts by mere reading of

books. You act and do as intended and instructed by

our acaryasarvabhauma Sri Vedanta Desika. It is only

by prapannas [those who have performed saranagati]

that liberation could be achieved. For others Lord

Mukunda will not grant liberation thus it is stated very

clearly by Srimad Desikan in the Srimad

Rahasayatrayasaram. Therefore, try to know clearly

all these and other such truths by approaching an

acarya.

 

P: Svamin! you, who has advised and instructed me so

patiently is my acarya. Please accept me as your

disciple and save me. Many salutations to you! [He

falls at his feet].

 

T: Rise- up! 0 Subandhu! You too resort to our

Vedantacarya. I shall lead you.

 

[Rise takes Subandu with him. Then happens the

resorting to the acarya.]

==============================================================

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...