Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

(No subject)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

-But, Buddha is considered, even by Sri

-Vaishnavaas, as an avathaaram, albeit, one in which the

-Lord preached lies to the asuraas. This is not a

-very broad minded acceptance of Buddha, but consistent

-with our view of Buddism. I am not sure how the north

-Indians accept Buddha as one of the avatharams without

-prejudice to the vEdhaas.

 

In exactly the same way as the southerners do;

there is no difference at all. The Buddha

is said to have preached un-vedic and therefore

untruthful things to sow confusion and bring

about the downfall of the bad ones.

 

-Among the south Indian 10, I am more puzzled with

-Parasu Raamar than some of the others. Is the concept of

-implicit obedience to father the main contribution of this

-avatharam? Was he an avaathaaram only until his

-encounter with Sri Raamar? This must be so as he was

-unable to defeat Bheeshmar later. Would that not make

-him less than the other avathaarams?

 

What is the story of his encounter

with Bhishmar ? I haven't heard of it.

 

RS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...