Request for final Proof Reading for pasurams having "dual references"

[Guest guest]

There are certain paasurrams classifed under certain temples, but the

vyaagyaanams from different schools differ on them. One such example is that

the mention of "viNNagar" in the thiruvanthaathi paasuram I had posted on

Sholingar few days back.. It is acknowledged by some schools that this is

referred to "ThiruviNNagar" or Oppiliappan Koil (as also found in the temple

protocol), however, some of the schools followed by Vadagalai iyengars and some

of the books like LIFCO etc, mentions that as per poorvaachaayar

(Raamaanujar's) vyaakyaanam this refers to Sri vaikundam. If this paasuram is

not included in that temple's listing, then one aazwaar name itself will not

come in under this temple. So It depends on who is doing this task and with

reference to which book. My suggestion is that we should try to accomodate and

include as many paasurams as possible under a temple so that a positive

inclusion of every school of thoughts is envisioned. Though there are not so

many "such" paasurams having such dual references, it is preferred some one

from each school or some one or a group of us who have access to different

viyaagyaanamas from various schools, proof read each of these stahala puraanam

references before we call it completed.

Thanks

Sampath Rengi

 

Sampath Rengi