On Thevu Matrariyen

[Guest guest]

On Thevu Matrariyen

 

Dear Mr. Dileepan,

 

I am sorry that the construction of my sentence had given room for a mistaken

impression of what I was trying to explain.

 

I was just referring to the discussion between you and Mr Badri on the

subject of 'Thevu Matrariyen' being deemed blasphemous IF interpreted

literally. I did not mean to say either yourself or Mr Badri or anyone else

in our group held such a view.

 

All of us, I believe, are agreed that IF ( there is a big IF there) IF

anyone were to hold such a view THEN ( there is a THEN also), THEN, it would

not be correct. I have explained how and why it would not be correct, how the

Lord would not feel jealous of being sidelined in preference to His own

Bhakta ( Acharya) and how such an incorrect interpretation could be

construed as an ' ingeneous attempt at creating a rift between Bhagavaan and

Bhaagavata'.

 

As for ulterior motive, I do not suspect either you or Mr Badri or anyone

else in our group, but the same cannot be said of those who might happen to

hold a wrongful interpretation of the words 'Thevu Matrariyen".

 

I hope I have made myself clear.

 

Dasoham

Anbil Ramaswamy

 

 

On Thevu Matrariyen

 

Dear Mr. Dileepan,

 

I am sorry that the construction of my sentence had given room for a mistaken

impression of what I was trying to explain.

 

I was just referring to the discussion between you and Mr Badri on the

subject of 'Thevu Matrariyen' being deemed blasphemous IF interpreted

literally. I did not mean to say either yourself or

Mr Badri or anyone else in our group held such a view. All of us are agreed

that IF ( there is a big IF there) IF anyone were to hold such a view THEN (

there is a THEN also), THEN, it would not be correct. I have explained how

and why it would not be correct, how the Lord would not feel jealous of being

sidelined in preference to His own Bhakta ( Acharya) and how such an

incorrect interpretation could be construed as an ' ingeneous attempt at

creating a rift between Bhagavaan and Bhaagavata'.

 

As for ulterior motive, I do not suspect either you or Mr Badri or anyone

else in our group, but the same cannot be said of those who might happen to

hold a wrongful interpretation of the words 'Thevu Matrariyen".

 

I hope I have made myself clear.

 

Dasoham

Anbil Ramaswamy