Guest guest Posted October 10, 1996 Report Share Posted October 10, 1996 --------------------------begin Jaganath's quote Prapatti as is understood today is done only for moksha. But Prapatti can be done for securing other fruits as well, as in the case of Draupadi, who did so for the safety of her husbands. --------------------------end quote Prapatti involves the recognition that the Lord is both Upaya and Upeya, and consequently, could involve no other desire than the desire for Him. It follows, then, that Prapatti done with the motivation to secure other fruits could not be considered Prapatti at all. I think it would be more in conformance with the nature of Prapatti to presume that the Lord, out of His Unfathomable Compassion, will provide whatever is best for the devotee, whether he/she desires it or not. This is best illustrated by the Prapatti of Vibhishana. He sought nothing other than Sri Rama's Mercy, and yet, the Lord bestowed upon him the Kingdom of Lanka. In the case of Sri Yamunacharya, there is no doubt that his heartfelt wish was that Emperumaanaar would succeed him. However, there is no evidence within the Stotraratna that he indicated this to the Lord in the performance of Prapatti. The Stotraratna paradigmatically indicates the true nature of Prapatti, desiring the Lord as the "be all and end all." I would only presume that the Lord fulfilled Yamunacharya's wish out of His Mercy, in the same manner as the bestowing of a kingdom to Vibishana. Daasanu Daasan, Mohan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 1996 Report Share Posted October 11, 1996 LDVR31A (MR MOHAN R SAGAR)> wrote: >--------------------------begin Jaganath's quote > >Prapatti as is understood today is done only for moksha. But >Prapatti can be done for securing other fruits as well, as in the >case of Draupadi, who did so for the safety of her husbands. > >--------------------------end quote > >Prapatti involves the recognition that the Lord is both Upaya and >Upeya, and consequently, could involve no other desire than the >desire for Him. It follows, then, that Prapatti done with the >motivation to secure other fruits could not be considered Prapatti at >all. Is there any evidence for this (i.e. prapatti for other fruits is not prapatti at all) in the sampradaya or verses such as sthOthrarathana? Kaakaasuran surrendered to the Lord with only one thing in mind, escaping the wrath of the asthram the Lord had sent after him. Even though this prapatti was done without any recognition or understanding that the Lord is the Upeya, Kaakaasuran was not only saved from the asthram, but he got mOksham as well. -- Dileepan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 1996 Report Share Posted October 11, 1996 >Prapatti involves the recognition that the Lord is both Upaya and >Upeya, and consequently, could involve no other desire than the >desire for Him. It follows, then, that Prapatti done with the >motivation to secure other fruits could not be considered Prapatti at >all. Is there any evidence for this (i.e. prapatti for other fruits is not prapatti at all) in the sampradaya or verses such as sthOthrarathana? Kaakaasuran surrendered to the Lord with only one thing in mind, escaping the wrath of the asthram the Lord had sent after him. Even though this prapatti was done without any recognition or understanding that the Lord is the Upeya, Kaakaasuran was not only saved from the asthram, but he got mOksham as well. -- Dileepan The Rahasya Traya Sara as well as a number of chillarai Rahasyas of Swami Desikan discusses the question of Prapatti exhaustively. Prapatti is a valid method per shastras for obtaining any fruit one wants similar to a Satyanarayana puja or a temple archana. Swami Desikan asks, "If Prapatti can obtain moksha itself which cannot be obtained by any other method (well almost), can it not deliver other fruits which are comparatively insignificant?" The reason that Prapatti is not used (thankfully) for other fruits is because of so much disinformation spread about it. I am not referring to any postings on the net but conversations with my relatives and other people born in families that descended from Srivaishnavas. Also the handful of people who can do Prapatti will not do it for anything other than moksha. Jaganath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.