Guest guest Posted October 27, 1996 Report Share Posted October 27, 1996 SrimatE lakshminrsumha parabrahmaNE namaha Sri vedanta desika guravE namaha Sriman Tatachari vehemently protested a few days ago in his posting against exclusion of "Kshama" in the list of most suitable synonyms for "daya" in the sense in which Swami Desikan employs it in his Daya Satakam. I liked the way Sriman Tatachari put it :"it takes 57 ounces of daya,27 ounces of karuna,11 ounces of krupa and anukampa each to make one ounce of kshama"!Well said, indeed! The eloquent and forceful defence of kshama by Sriman Tatachari made me give the matter a lot of thought during the day. I suppose it was at the back of the mind in the night too. For this morning as I was flipping through the Daya Satakam again Swami Desikan himself, so to say, seemed to have the answer. I refer to verse No.72 of the daya satakam : vrishagiripater-hridayA viswAvatAra sahayinee kshapitanikhilAvadyA devi! kshamAdinishEvitAs I bhuvana janani pumsam bhogApavargavidhAyinee vitamasi padE vyaktim nityAm bibharshi dayE! svayam II In the above verse Swami Desikan seems to suggest that other attributes of the Lord like "Kshama" verily are subordinate to Daya in Her ministrations to the Lord in His various avataras.("kshamAdi-nishEvitAs"). How does Sriman Tatachari propose to handle Swami Desikan's preference ? Would kshama still qualify in the face of the import of this shloka ? SrimatE srivan sri narayana yatIndra mahadesikAya namaha humbly, sudarshan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.