Guest guest Posted November 13, 1996 Report Share Posted November 13, 1996 Dear Divya Prabandha rasikas, Is there any internal evidence in the perumaaL tirumozhi for kulaSEkhara mahaaraaja being "cEralar kOn" (king of kerala) as said in the taniyan? In the signature paasurams, he calls himself kUdalar kOn (king of kUdal, near madurai, right?), kozhikkOn (king of woraiyur, near Srirangam), but never says anything about cEra dESam. He also does not call himself perumaaL, which is the family name of the kerala dynasty. Was kulaSEkharan really a Malayali? ;-) Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.