Guest guest Posted November 25, 1996 Report Share Posted November 25, 1996 Mani Varadarajan <mani >> Azhvaar establishing Sriman Narayana as the supreme >> the Pandiyan court ... > >It is my understanding that Periyaazhvaar was a poor >temple brahmin..... >The epithet ``bhattar piraan'' most probably was applied >to Vishnuchittan because of his great bhakti to PerumaaL, and that >too only after his vision of the Lord at Madurai as recorded >in the thiruppallaandu. > >periyaazhvaar thiruvadigaLE SaraNam > >kaarmali mEni niRaththu kaNNapiraanai ugandhu >vaarmali kongai yasOdhai manchanam aattiya vaaRRai >paarmali thol pudhuvaik kOn bhattar piraan sonna paadal >seermali senthamizh vallaar theevinaiyaadhum ilarE > >Mani It is this "pudhuvaik kOn" (King of pudhuvai) which made Vidya Dehejia speculate that he was probably a Brahmin King/Chief. As you say, it must have been his status "after" winning the "poRkizhi" in the Pandian's court. Srinivasan K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.