Guest guest Posted February 3, 1997 Report Share Posted February 3, 1997 My compliments to Mr. Sudarshan on his outstanding presentation of Paramapada Sopanam. Swami Desikan's examination of the psychology of spiritual progress was very well accentuated by Mr. Sudarshan's eloquent writing style and his witty references to modern day analogies. The Srirangam Acharyas also have similar concepts regarding the slow progressive process towards prapatti. Patricia Mumme, in defining prapatti, cites the example of Acharya Hrdayam 14 - 15. In commenting on these verses, Manavalamamunigal describes in some detail how the Lord, out of His Boundless Compassion, guides an individual from the stage of agnosticism to the level of a prapanna: 1. An agnostic/atheist first becomes aware of some small aspect of Sastra, such as a mantra or a pooja, that can be utilized to procure some material benefit. 2. By securing such a material benefit, the once atheist now becomes a believer in Sastra, as both a means for obtaining material benefits as well as a means of enjoying Swarga at the end of his/her present life. 3. The disciplined life associated with adhering to Sastra leads the now aspirant to recognize the difference between the temporal material world and the immortal self, leading he/she to pursue self-realization. 4. Self-realization leads to the recognition of the Sriman Narayana as the Antarayami, causing the aspirant to strive towards Him through Bhakti Yoga. 5. The path of Bhakti Yoga leads the aspirant to recognize his/her inability to reach the Lord through self effort, which results in the realization that the Lord Himself is both the Way and the Goal. The aspirant then ceases his/her self-motivated activities through Prapatti and realizes his/her true nature as a Sesa of the Lord. Daasanu Daasan, Mohan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 1997 Report Share Posted February 3, 1997 I would prefer if we moved away from using terms such as ``Srirangam acharyas'' and ``Kanchi acharyas'' on a regular basis. This implies that there were two opposing camps then and there itself, which could not be further from the truth. Further, Desika, nominally a Kanchi acharya, spent some of the most productive years of his life in Srirangam. [The thirumaaLigai-s of both Desika and his praacaarya Nadadur Ammal can be seen to this day in the southeast corner of the first prakaaram outside the kOvil.] Similarly, Manavala Maamunigal, nominally a Srirangam acharya, spent a great deal of time in Kanchipuram. He is said to have done one full kaalakshepam of the Sribhashya in Yathoktakari Swami Sannidhi [Thiruvehka]. He has also composed the Devaraja Mangalam on Varadaraja Swamy. I request some Kanchipuram natives can enlighten us as to whether this Mangalam is still recited regularly in perumaaL kOvil. Perhaps it is better to refer to the acharya by name when we speak of their teachings, rather than lumping them into an artificial Srirangam or Kanchi category? There are also mutual disagreements between Periya Vaaccaan Pillai, Pillai Lokacarya, and Azhagiya Manavala Perumal Nayanar, at least on the surface. So it may be better to leave the compartmentalization for those rare occasions which truly require them. Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.