Guest guest Posted February 13, 1997 Report Share Posted February 13, 1997 Dear friends, One other question on the 'PPS' posts variously raised by some 'bhAgavatOttamA-s' was as follows: **In spite of reaching the 'prasadana-parva' and embracing the 'padukA-s' in a spirit of true "prappati", Bharatha nevertheless had to return to the Ayodhya- palace and to all the things of the world which hitherto elicited nothing but his utter revulsion and contempt ("virakthi"). **So how does Bharatha reconcile in his mind to the fact that even after 'prappati', he still has to willy-nilly "transact daily business" with a world he basically loathes ? **How does the act of "prappati" magically and instantly change the fundamental nature of all those feelings of deep revulsion an aspirant previously harboured for the material world ? **Is it really possible to transform the nature of such intense feelings of "virakthi" overnight into one of "philosophical resignation" as Bharatha seemed to have done on his return to Ayodhya from Chitrakoota ? Another related question, dear 'bhAgavatOttamA-s', was as follows: **It was observed (in one of my posts) : "Bharatha amply demonstrated his revulsion for the power and pelf that goes with the office of the King of Ayodhya; he spurned the job with all its attendent perquisites of opulence and ostentation; he was willing to denounce his mother, father and even his guru; he did not have a moment's thought for his own spouse; the majesty of the Court of the Ishvaku Empire meant nothing to him; palace treasury, royal guards, hunting trips, banquets and balls, carriages, splendid horses, court jesters and poets, retinues of loyal courtiers ...(meant nothing to him).." Now after returning to Ayodhya and performing the "paduka-pattAbhishEkam", Bharatha is perforce enjoined by the position he holds as Proxy Head-of-State to enjoy the perquisites and power accompanying the same office. Palace-protocol too would have forced him on certain ceremonious occasions to indulge in the very same pomp and luxuries of Royalty he rejected before his visit to Lord Rama at Chitrakoota !! Now how does one reconcile all this ? Indeed, shouldn't we ask, how one can explain the anamalous situation after "prappati" when, after rejecting all sources of the "material enjoyment" of the world, the "prappana" is once more forced into accepting the same set of "material" circumstances that prevailed in his life prior to performing "prappatti"? ***************************************** The above are all very, very pertinent and searching questions that arise from a serious study of Swami Desikan's "paramapada-sOpAnam", dear 'bhAgavatOttamA-s'. It is good we discuss these things threadbare if we are to gather some insight into their concept. The answers to the above questions are not directly, I believe, given by Swami Desikan himself in the "PPS". If they are, then, they are couched in the language of high philosophy which perhaps will require a proper "AchArya" (personal mentor) to explain adequately to us. But even without such "AchAryA-upadEsam", we can always do the next best thing. We can glean some tentative answers by referring to other great SriVaishnava 'AchAryA-s' of the past who have addressed those very questions raised above. The great Sri.Parashara Bhattar has given us some semblance of answers to the sort of questions raised above. Bhattar, as we all know, was an 'AchArya' who had exceptional ability to offer answers to knotty questions through very simple day-to-day analogies that anybody could understand. I shall share some of Sri.Parashara Bhattar's explanations on "virakthi" and the "post-prappathi" period in the next post. sudarshan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.