Guest guest Posted May 3, 1997 Report Share Posted May 3, 1997 An interesting turn of events is bringing about this series of postings. I had not intended to send the short note concurring with Mani, because I realized soon after writing it that I should hold off until Mr. Kalale had a chance to clarify himself. Unfortunately, I forgot to remove the message from my outbasket, and it was automatically sent when I downloaded E-mail on Thursday. But, to paraphrase my own statements, perhaps this is good in some way. So, the following is my elaboration, in response to Mr. Dileepan, on this unintentionally sent message. But, I would like to take this a little further and examine Mr. Kalale's follow up message, on the question of Grace and its limits. I am going to make this discussion very generic, because I would be interested in hearing Mani's insights on the seeming misconceptions that started this discussion. Much of the following are as much my own musings and observations as they are discussions based on what I have read on the subject of Grace as it relates to Prapatti. But first a few thoughts on my own shortcomings. Being of Andhra origin, and having grown up in the US (albeit in a devout but ecclectic environment,) at times makes me feel completely unqualified to even call myself a SriVaishnava, let alone engage in deep philosophical discussions with such Bhagavathas as those of you in this forum. My level of active participation comes from my sheer joy in having the opportunity to engage in such discussions with all of you. If I may be overstepping my bounds, please do correct me, for I desire to be nothing more than a student in this forum. With that, my thoughts on Grace.... <continued> Daasanu Daasan, Mohan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 1997 Report Share Posted May 3, 1997 Dear Sri Mohan Sagar: I am gald you are going to elaborate your views about grace in general. I shall look forward to your comments. But, first, I would like you to be a bit more specific. Since Sri Krishna was labelled as having misunderstood Swami Sri Desikan and since you concurred with it, please address this specific issue as soon as possible. It is important that such characterizations are not left dangling too long without any justification. Remember, to show that Sri Krishna's views were misconceptions you must show, with Swami Sri Desikan's words, that our Karma has absolutely no role for mOksham. If you can't show this, frankly, you, and Sri Mani, owe him an apology. I request you to resolve this issue first before getting into the general topic of grace. Thank you. -- Dileepan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.