Guest guest Posted May 12, 1997 Report Share Posted May 12, 1997 Dear members of the prapatthi group : Both of the two works of Sri Ramanuja deal with the Brahma SutrAs of BadarAyaNA , who is considered as Veda VyasA himself. Vedas were systematized by Vyasa Bhagavan . Next he focused on the Upanishads , which are known as Vedantha , since they are considered the head or gist of VedAs . Sage Vyasa /BadarAyaNA chose few upanishadic pasages and created concise aphorisms (SutrAs ) for them to establish their true meaning beyond any refutation . These SutrAs by their very nature were short and hence commentaries were needed to elaborate on the meaning intended by BadarAyaNA . There are no less than 14 commentaries on the Brahma SutrAs by different AcharyAs and scholars , each of which claim that theirs is the most correct intrepretation of the views of BadarAyaNA . Aadhi Sankara , RamAnuja , MadhvAchArya , PurNaprajna , Bhaaskara , Nimbhaarka , VallabhA and others are among the fourteen or more , who have written commentaries on Brahma SutrAs . Sri RamAnujA 's elaborate commentary on Brahma Sutras ( Sri Bhashyam ) , shorter and the intermediate versions ( Vedantha saaraa and Vedantha deepA respectively ) provide the authoritative texts for us to understand the glory of Bhagavadh RaamAnuja siddhAntham . The Adayar Library and Research Center has released the English translation of Vedantha Saara by Sri M.B. Narasimha Iyengar in 1953. The Sanskrit text for this translation was edited by Pandit V.Krishnamacharya. The Vedantha DeepA was translated into English by Sri Bhashyam from its Tamil Commentary by Uttamur Swamigal in 1990 . It appeared as a volume in the Ubhaya Vedantha GranthamAlA series . V.Sadagopan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.