Guest guest Posted November 25, 1997 Report Share Posted November 25, 1997 Dear Prapatti Group Members: I am referring to the recent note by Dileepan. All of us respect our Acharyas and interpretations can differ. There are several instances where different interpretations can lead to different (equally valid) conclusions. But in discussions like this I do not think that it is good to keep implicating Bhaghavata Apacharam. I quote the passage from Anbil Swamigal's posting: "Let us remind ourselves of the warning that of the various impediments to Moksha ( Virodi Swarupam) and Apacharas include- i. Deeming the Alwars and Acharyas as mere human beings like any of us and ii. Judging Archa murthis with reference to the material (stone, metal etc) with which they are made. I wonder if Sri. B and those who uphold his interpretations are aware of this." I do not think such warnings serve any other purpose other than creating fear psychosis and driving away people. We have to understand the sensitivities of the people who for some reason have not been exposed to SriVaishnava tradition in their childhood and who are now willing to embrace it. I think the Bhakti list is read by many such people and we have to respect their sensitivity and not turn them away by such rhetoric. Vijayaraghavan Srinivasan Buffalo, NY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.