Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

SamAshrayanam

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Bhakti Group Members:

 

Sri. Paundarikapuram Acharyan, Shri. Gopala Desikan swamy told my wife when

performing Pancha SamskAram to her that she should say "am" instead of

Pranavam in ashtAcharam and in stotras. This may be generally followed in the

Vadakalai sects. Even, today I hear from some that women folks shoud not chant

Sri. VishnusahasranAma stotram for whatever reason.

 

Govindarajan Dasan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Even, today I hear from some that women folks shoud not chant

> Sri. VishnusahasranAma stotram for whatever reason.

 

I have also heard this, but only from informal Sri Vaishnavas --

never an acharya or scholar. I suspect this is a practice

carried out in some places where women were naturally and

culturally restricted in many ways from learning and religious

knowledge.

 

Sri VishnusahasranAma stotram is unequivocally meant for

everyone, and everyone should learn and recite it. It is

from the Mahabharata, to which there are absolutely no

restrictions, traditional or otherwise.

 

In the end, it is my belief that we should move away from

restrictions such as these and encourage all to share in

our religious wealth. In this case, for example, the

VishnusahasranAma is just a list of the names of the Lord --

and why should anyone be stopped from reciting that?

 

adiyEn Mani

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 12:20 PM 1/22/98 -0800, you wrote:

>

>I have also heard this, but only from informal Sri Vaishnavas --

>never an acharya or scholar. I suspect this is a practice

>carried out in some places where women were naturally and

>culturally restricted in many ways from learning and religious

>knowledge.

 

 

Sri Srivatsangachar who is considered a scholar did say

this. It is on tape. He quoted the couplet that follows,

"Parvatyuvacha" in which Parvathi says to her husband she

wishes to hear, (srOthum ichchaam). He narrated a story

that leads up to this exchange between Siva and Parvathi.

Sri Srivatsangachar's words approximately were, "women

are not supposed to, but they do these days, let us not

get into that."

 

>

>Sri VishnusahasranAma stotram is unequivocally meant for

>everyone, and everyone should learn and recite it.

 

 

I don't disagree with the intent of the above

statement. However, perhaps even unrelated to

the present context, I am wary of us, who are

only "informal Sri Vaishnavas" for whom Sri

Vasihnava scholarship is only a part-time

hobby, making policy for all.

 

 

-- adiyEn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> He narrated a story

> that leads up to this exchange between Siva and Parvathi.

> Sri Srivatsangachar's words approximately were, "women

> are not supposed to, but they do these days, let us not

> get into that."

 

These cultural restrictions on bhagavan-nAma-sankirtanam

that become codified as law because of some story or other

makes me uncomfortable. If this were how our religion

were universally practiced, I would be quite ashamed of

it. This is my personal belief.

 

However, I think there is a difference of opinion on this

as well -- and thank PerumaaL for that!

 

Those who wish to follow (in my mind) illogical and

destructive restrictions can. I know I am only an

"amateur" Sri Vaishnava. But I cannot follow something

that strikes at the very heart of what I consider

great about our sampradAya.

 

adiyEn Mani

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dear bhakthas,

i've posed the question of women reciting hymns in praise of

the lord to my grand-uncle,Sri U.Ve.Purisai Krishnamaachariyar Swami, on

a few occasions and the replies on all those occasions have been that

women are not supposed to recite any of these hymns aloud.

i shall now reproduce my best efforts at translating whatever

was said to me by the swami[in tamil].

' Reciting hymns aloud implies others hearing them and learning

about the lord etc..Recitation of hymns aloud,for the world to hear, is

supposed to be a man's duty.And hence when a woman recites these

aloud,she is transgressing her duty limits.

A woman is also attracting undue attention to herself by way

of her sweet voice which is heard by one and all when she recites slokas

aloud.'

personally,i am not qualified by any means to give any comment

whatsoever.

adiyongal daasavargam,

athi saranathan.

>

>At 12:20 PM 1/22/98 -0800, you wrote:

>>

>>I have also heard this, but only from informal Sri Vaishnavas --

>>never an acharya or scholar. I suspect this is a practice

>>carried out in some places where women were naturally and

>>culturally restricted in many ways from learning and religious

>>knowledge.

>

>

>Sri Srivatsangachar who is considered a scholar did say

>this. It is on tape. He quoted the couplet that follows,

>"Parvatyuvacha" in which Parvathi says to her husband she

>wishes to hear, (srOthum ichchaam). He narrated a story

>that leads up to this exchange between Siva and Parvathi.

>Sri Srivatsangachar's words approximately were, "women

>are not supposed to, but they do these days, let us not

>get into that."

>

>

>>

>>Sri VishnusahasranAma stotram is unequivocally meant for

>>everyone, and everyone should learn and recite it.

>

>

>I don't disagree with the intent of the above

>statement. However, perhaps even unrelated to

>the present context, I am wary of us, who are

>only "informal Sri Vaishnavas" for whom Sri

>Vasihnava scholarship is only a part-time

>hobby, making policy for all.

>

>

>-- adiyEn

>

 

 

 

A.V.SARANATHAN

TEMPORARY ADDRESS: PHONE NO:4673805

W-221,NEW HOSTEL,

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT,CALCUTTA

DIAMOND HARBOUR ROAD,JOKA

P.O.16757,CALCUTTA-700027

E-MAIL: SARODAD

SARO

 

 

____

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 11:55 AM 1/23/98 -0800, Mani Varadarajan wrote:

>

>> Sri Srivatsangachar's words approximately were, "women

>> are not supposed to, but they do these days, let us not

>> get into that."

>

>These cultural restrictions on bhagavan-nAma-sankirtanam

>that become codified as law because of some story or other

>makes me uncomfortable.

>From what I have written it is a stretch to conclude

that attempt was being made to codify some dreadful

law to suppress anyone. Srivatsangachar just indicated

what the sampradayam was and did not even want to get

into a discussion, either for or against the practice.

 

I truly regret having dragged the good name of Sri Srivatsangachar

into this discussion. He has contributed and still contributing

more to Sri Ramanuja Dharsanam compared to all of us here in the

net put together.

 

 

-- adiyEn Srivatsangachar dhasan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...