Guest guest Posted January 25, 1998 Report Share Posted January 25, 1998 Swami EmperumAnAr says in SaraNAgathi Gadhyam: "asEshAvasthOchitha asEsha sEshathaika rathiroopa nithya kainkarya prApthyapEkashayA" A cursory interpretation for the above may land one into thinking that as a Muktha one would get to perform all kinds of service at all places and at all times. If this is so, what about the services such as the Lord's divine bed, a function of AdhisEshan, and the Lord's vehicle, a function of Garuda, or other services currently being performed by Nithyas and Mukthaas already in Vaikuntam. Will a Muktha demand that he also be a bed to the Lord? Will he say, "Why can't I be the vehicle to the Lord?" Swami Sri Desikan provides three clarifications for this. (1) The service that a Mutkha would seek is "preethikAritha", i.e. that which pleases him. Now, what would be pleasing to the Muktha? The answer is, whatever pleases the Lord will be pleasing to the Muktha. Since the Muktha's jyana is not contracted he will completely know that it pleases the Lord to have the Nithyas and other Mukthas perform their assigned duties. Therefore, the Muktha will not feel that only one of the services not available to him will be pleasing to him. Actually it is the other way around - it will be pleasing to the recent Muktha to see the others perform those services, much like we taking pleasure in the Bhattar performing "Thirumanjanam" to the Lord in a temple. Our pleasure is no less compared to that of the Bhattar who is actually performing the Thirumanjanam. For example, in our recent Denver meeting our pleasure watching and assisting our Sri Vijayaraghavan perform the wonderful ThiruvAradhanai was greater, or at least no less, than his own. (2) The essential nature of a Jiva is to be a servant of the Lord and other Bhagavathaas. As a Muktha, the Jiva will be fully cognizant of this essential nature. Thus, a service that is meant for another Bhagavatha will not give him any pleasure. Even in this world where the Swaroopa Jyanam of a Mumukshu is contracted, one Bhagavatha does not seek to perform the duties of another Bhagavathas. For example, we don't go to a temple and demand to perform the Aradhana ourselves. We understand our individual roles and do not find pleasure in doing something that is not meant for us. Then, in Vaikuntam, where the Swaroopa Jyanam is fully manifest, there is no question of a Muktha wanting to do something that is not available to him. (3) As a Muktha our pleasure in Vaikuntam is _not_ performing service to the Lord, but to see the Lord pleasured. Thus, a Muktha's goal is not doing service! The goal is to see the Lord pleasured. When a Muktha sees our Lord pleasured by the service provided by Nithyas and other Mukthas he would not seek to disturb that. He will only want to augment it by performing services that are available to him. p.s. The above is based on, not a translation of, pages 141 and 142 of Chapter 5 Thathva Thraiya Sinthana Athikaram of Srimad Rahasya Thraiya SAram Commentary by the 45th Jeeyar of Srimad Ahobila Mutt, published by Sri Nrusimha Priya Trust. -- adiyEn Srivatsangachar dhasan ------ P. Dileepan 423-755-4675 (Work) 423-877-9860 (Home) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 1998 Report Share Posted January 25, 1998 Sri Dileepan wrote: > As a Muktha our pleasure in Vaikuntam is _not_ > performing service to the Lord ... This makes a little bit of sense to me, but I am also confused. How would the acharya explain Andal's famous words from "siRRam siRu kaalE" -- "unakkE naam aatcheyvOm maRRai nam kaamangaL"? "to you alone will we be slaves, please remove all other desires?" This implies that the desire of Andal, if anything at all, is to be His slave. > ... but to see the Lord pleasured. This part I see entirely. > Thus, a Muktha's goal is not doing service! This conclusion seems a little far fetched. Do the two not go hand in hand? The service we do is because we are motivated by our svarUpa jnAna (knowledge of our essential nature) as His sesha, as well as bhakti, and these by their very nature will please Him. It seems the two go hand in hand. But my views here are tentative and just my gut reaction. Can someone clarify? Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 1998 Report Share Posted January 25, 1998 The following is a translation of the Tamil commentary of HH the 45th Jeeyar of Srimad Ahobila Mutt, relating to the third explanation for the saraNAgathi Gadya phrase posted earlier. This third explanation is to be understood within the context of the other two explanations. If one is not careless it would be clear that all three explanations are consistent with each other and equally valid. It is not fruitful to contrive a meaning for one explanation that contradicts with the other two. -- adiyEn =======Translation of the third explanation============== The Saranagathi Gadya phrase "asEshAvasthOchitha asEsha sEshathaika rathiroopa nithya kainkarya prApthyapEkashayA" should not be interpreted as "wishing for all kinds of service". If you did, inconsistency arises. Therefore, " asEsha .... kainkarya prApthyapEkashayA" should be understood as " asEsha .... kainkarya phala- prApthyapEkashayA". That is, we should understand the phrase as "I wish for the results of performing all kinds of service". In Vaikunta the only reason everyone performs service is to please the Lord. With that the Lord is delighted. Seeing this the rest are delighted. That is, some perform the services that are assigned to them and it delights the Lord. This makes the rest get delighted as well. Why else would everyone perform service to the Lord but to pleasure Him. Thus how does it matter whether this pleasure is created due to services we perform or others perform. The pleasure derived by those who perform the service and those who simply watch such service being performed are equal. Even though there is difference in the service that is performed, there is no difference in the pleasures derived. There is no inequality in the pleasure enjoyed between those who perform the service and those who simply watch. Thus, even if the Mukthas don't get to do all the services, they enjoy equal pleasure as enjoyed by Anantha, Garuda, and Visvaksena from the services they perform, respectively. =========================================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 1998 Report Share Posted January 26, 1998 The following is a translation of the Tamil commentary of HH the 45th Jeeyar of Srimad Ahobila Mutt, relating to the third explanation for the saraNAgathi Gadya phrase posted earlier. This third explanation is to be understood within the context of the other two explanations. If one is not careless it would be clear that all three explanations are consistent with each other and equally valid. It is not fruitful to contrive a meaning for one explanation that contradicts with the other two. -- adiyEn =======Translation of the third explanation============== The Saranagathi Gadya phrase "asEshAvasthOchitha asEsha sEshathaika rathiroopa nithya kainkarya prApthyapEkashayA" should not be interpreted as "wishing for all kinds of service". If you did, inconsistency arises. Therefore, " asEsha .... kainkarya prApthyapEkashayA" should be understood as " asEsha .... kainkarya phala- prApthyapEkashayA". That is, we should understand the phrase as "I wish for the results of performing all kinds of service". In Vaikunta the only reason everyone performs service is to please the Lord. With that the Lord is delighted. Seeing this the rest are delighted. That is, some perform the services that are assigned to them and it delights the Lord. This makes the rest get delighted as well. Why else would everyone perform service to the Lord but to pleasure Him. Thus how does it matter whether this pleasure is created due to services we perform or others perform. The pleasure derived by those who perform the service and those who simply watch such service being performed are equal. Even though there is difference in the service that is performed, there is no difference in the pleasures derived. There is no inequality in the pleasure enjoyed between those who perform the service and those who simply watch. Thus, even if the Mukthas don't get to do all the services, they enjoy equal pleasure as enjoyed by Anantha, Garuda, and Visvaksena from the services they perform, respectively. =========================================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.