Guest guest Posted January 28, 1998 Report Share Posted January 28, 1998 SRI: Dearest sisters and brothers, In Thiruvaaimozhi 2.4.2 though I had written that kaNNan plucked the 1000 shoulders of vaaNaasurA, I wrote within parantheses that kaNNan kileed vaaNAsurA which is not correct- as explained beautifully bu Sri MuraLi below. I am sorry for the mistake. May be when I wrote asurA, subconsciously in my mind, I wanted kaNNan to kill the asurA.- I did not know the asurA's lineage- Sorry again. thanks a LOT , Sri MuraLi for your good words spoken about the posts. There are many who write such appreciations. recently Sri Vijai Triplicane too sent me a pat on my back. It makes me well with tears in my eyes when parama bhagavathAs and learned scholars of this group like you write and praise the blabberings of mine. It is the inspiration from all other excellent posts (What depths of information and rasikhyam of posts on saint ThyagarajA's kritis by Sri Sadagopan, the info from Sri Anand, the practical reality of Srirangam by Sri keshav dAs, the personal prayer post from Smt Viji raghunAthan!) I can not match even a millionth of essence of these posts. It is like the elders clapping a kid's "mazhalai blabber" just because it is their kid. It is Sriman Narayanan's grace that makes them likeable by bhAgavathALs. thanks again everybody. Warm Regards Narayana dAsan madhavakkannan Dearest Sriman Kannan, Thanks again for sharing the outpourings of the Azhwar as the mother of ParAnkusha Nayaki. The summary of verses 2.3 and 2.4 was brilliant. Indeed when one reads writings like yours coming forth from intense Anubhavam of the work of the Azhwar, one is transported literally to Sri Vaikuntam. This happens unconsicously in front of the computer terminal. In verse 2 of the summary below, you mention that Lord Krishna killed Banasura to rescue his grandson from the Asura's prison. I think Lord Krishna maimed him of his 1000 arms but spared his life since the Asura was Mahabali's grandson. Also since the Asura belonged to the ineage of Prahlada which had been assured of constant protection by the Lord, he was spared. A third reason is the request of Lord Shiva (who went to war with the Lord since he had promised Banasura unconditional support, but was easily defeated by Lord Krishna). Namo Narayana, Muralidhar Rangaswamy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.