Guest guest Posted April 23, 1998 Report Share Posted April 23, 1998 >SrI P. SrI interprets that rAma was meditating on amalanAdhipirAn >(because of the use of the edugai words 'amala' and 'nimala'), >since HE is doing parihAram for having talked jovially to SUrpaNakha. > >It also shows how well-learned about AzhwAr's prabhandams kamban was. > >It should be borne in mind here that we should ignore the kAlam >difference between rAmAvatAra kAlam and pANAzhwAr's kAlam, but learn to >enjoy the kamba rasam as expounded so nicely by Sri P. SrI. > >adiyEn, >kalyani krishnamachari >ps. This information has been taken from a book on amalanAdhipirAn by >an unknown author - published by SAnti press. >[bharadwaj, Jaganath] >There is no reason to ignore the KAlam difference between Sri Rama avatAram >and pANAzhwAr's kAlam. Sri Krishna clearly explains in the Geeta that the >Bhagavad Geeta was taught to Vivaswan in some previous age, but because the >message was lost, He is repeating it again. Similarly the Azhwar Pasuram's >which are the Vedas themselves are eternally chanted in Sri Vaikuntham. >These were manifest through Sri thirupANAzhwAr for our benefit in Kali Yuga. >There is no reason to assume that we currently have information on everything >that was known to our Rishis back in trEta Yuga. Just as they were able to >comprehend the VEdas, some of them (agasthya perhaps?) could have >comprehended the divya prabandhams in the same way. > >adiyen >jaganath. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.