Guest guest Posted May 3, 1998 Report Share Posted May 3, 1998 Dear "bhAgavatOttamA-s" of the Bhakti-Group, Here are some excerptive gists from a discourse on the Ramayana by Sri.Mukkur Swamy last week at Triplicane: a) The Ramayana is a many-splendoured jewel. It can slake your intellectual thirst; it can whet your literary appetite; it can give you unfailing comfort of moral counsel; it is a magnificent hand-book of reference to ethical human behaviour under inimical circumstances in life (I might add from personal experience that it is also an entertaining read on a dusty train journey anywhere in India !!). b)Even if you were to baulk at approaching the Ramayana as "mere mythology", you cannot miss noticing and appreciating its great treasury of profoundly allegorical truth. For example, in the entire script of the Ramayana, you might, if you so choose, cease regarding the characters of Rama, Bharatha, Lakshmana and Shatrughna as dramatic characters. Instead, for a change, try and look upon them as each personifying the 4 great "chatur-vida-arthA-s" or ENDS of life. Look at them that way in the unfolding story of the Ramayana and it will provide you with a different set of insights: Thus say, Rama = "dharma" Lakshmana = "artha" Bharatha = "mOksha" Shatrughnan = "kAma" With the above equations in mind let's push the analysis along : "dharma" as we all know is described as "the path of RIGHTFUL conduct in life" (I deliberately desist from using the expression "righteous conduct" as it always seems to me to smack of "self-righteousness"). "artha" is, briefly, described to us as the "material means of obtaining fulfillment in life". "kAma" is, again very briefly speaking, described to us as the "sum of all desires that fuels our actions in life". "kAma" is the locomotor that drives the engine of our journey through life. It is a tribute to the wisdom of our great sages that they recognized "kAma" or Desire as an inclusive element in the General Aims of Human Existence. (Most other religious systems in the world we know are centrally pre-occupied with the outright rejection of "desire" in the human heart) "mOkshA" is a term we are all very familiar with. It denotes eternal liberation from mortal coils and from the cycle of re-birth. Now, in the Ramayana, one will certainly notice that in chapter after chapter, "kAnda" after "kAnda", the respective fates of Rama and Lakshmana are inseparably bound up with each other. Nothing happens indeed to the one without affecting the circumstance of the other also, isn't it ? So much so, we notice that Lakshmana hardly leaves Rama's side for even as much as a moment right through the dramatic script! Quite similarly, we know from the story-line that Shatrughnan never left the side of his brother Bharatha. They were indeed as inseparable and intimate with each other as the other set of brothers, Rama and Lakshmana. The allegorical moral to be derived from all this is : The 4 objectives of life ("chatur-vida-arthA") are in essence TWIN in character and in alignment with each other i.e. they can be paired-off as "dharma-ArthA" and "kAma-mOkshA". And so indeed they ought to be in the life of man. The attainment of "arthA" (the material means of fulfillment in life) can be realised only through "dharmA" i.e. "rightful conduct". Obtaining material fulfillment any other way will not be "arthA" but "un-arthA" (non-fulfillment in life i.e. frustration of the true purpose of human existence). "arthA" and "dharmA" are therefore to be regarded as inseparable and inter-twined as were Rama and Lakshmana. Impairment of one causes impairment to the other. Promotion of one accompanies promotion of the other. There is a relentless, self-perpetuating law operating in all this. You cannot attain true "arthA" by employing anything other than "dharmA". And by corrollary, the ends of "arthA" (material fulfillment) and the ends of "dharmA" (right conduct) ought never to exclude each other. The entire story of the Ramayana, if you analyse it well, is indeed nothing but a record of how the twin-principles of 'ArthA' and "dharma" operated in inseparable tandem in the furtherance of the interests of human society. Thus, as long as Rama and Lakshmana operated together we saw how Sage Viswamitra realised his great social missions in life, the sages of DandakAranya completed their lives' work, Ahalya and Sabari found their fulfillment and how Sugriva and Vibheeshana had their kingdoms restored to them. We also see from the Ramayana how attempts to separate or divorce the twin principles of "dharma" and "arthA" i.e. Rama and Lakshmana, resulted in unfortunate events. The demoness Surpanaka, if you recall wished to possess and ravish either Rama OR Lakshmana but there is no record to show she propositioned both together (we must leave it to our own imaginations to fathom what turn the story of the Ramayana would have then taken!!). She soon perished. In the "Aranya-kAnda" Maricha too manipulated the "separation" of Rama and Lakshmana temporarily and met his fatal end soon thereafter. Thus the message is subtle but very clear : the Pursuit of "ArthA" or "material fulfillment" divorced from "dhArmi-c" considerations leads to great un-happiness in the affairs of men in all times. By the same token, "kAma" and "mOkshA" are what Shatrughnana and Bharata were to each other. According to this life-principle, the only human "desire" worth desiring is the desire for "mOksha"! All other desires are inimical to the human condition. In the story of the Ramayana, references to Shatrughana are indeed scant. Valmiki it is said has no more than 3 or 4 shlOkA-s earmarked for this youngest scion of the Raghuvamsa family. And yet in the few verses devoted to Shatrughna Valmiki extols his greatness as a loyal and steadfast follower of Bharatha. Valmiki is actually extolling the highest and rarest of human aspirations --- the "kAmA" that afflicts the "mu-mookshu" (the seeker of liberation). Bharatha as "mOkshA" and Shatrughna as "kAma" together thus represent for Valmiki what is the natural and most primal urge of the human species in its march towards spiritual evolution. Together they represent the eternal hankering ('kAma") of the human spirit after its natural state called "mOkshA". More on these weighty subjects later. adiyEn, sudarshan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.