Ahimsa paramo dharmaha, Tondar-adi-podi, etc.

[Guest guest]

Sri Krishnaswami wrote:

: ... from the perspective of the conscience. From

:this perspective, I believe that the animal sacrifices mentioned in the Vedas

:refer not to the killing of animals per se, but to the sacrifice of the animal

:tendencies (gunas) in man. If our dear Acharya, Ramanuja, is to be interpreted

:correctly and understood in full justice to his demonstrated 'lokaas

:samasthaassukhino bhavanthu (may all worlds be well)' attitude, then I

:understand his message that 'animal sacrifice is good for the animal' to mean

:that sacrificing animal tendencies, man rises from the animal level of

:behavior to the human level of conduct.

 

While I appreciate Sri Krishnaswami's sentiment, this

kind of reading of Ramanuja and the Vedas is nothing

but politically correct revisionism, designed to suit

our modern sensibilities. There cannot be much doubt

that the Vedas prescribe actual animal sacrifice for

certain purposes, and that Ramanuja believed in the

efficacy of such rituals. However, as Murali Kadambi

pointed out (and which Dileepan has also poignantly

written about in his last article) this in no way implies

an endorsement of meat-eating or animal sacrifice. It

is more of a technical issue regarding the Vedas and

which the core principles under which a Sri Vaishnava

operates -- namely, adherence to and belief in the Vedic

teachings.

 

Regarding Tondar-adi-podi Alvar, and cutting off

the heads of Buddhists:

 

We may not be happy to hear what the Alvar wrote,

given our modern sensibilities. They may seem intolerant,

strident, etc. But please don't take the Alvar's words

out of context and therefore reject all that he has said.

The Alvar is certainly not encouraging us to commit acts

of violence against any other religion or person (unlike Islam).

I think Alvar would be horrified if we did that. He is merely

expressing his extreme frustration and anger against those who

repeatedly deny the existence of Sriman Narayana, and deny

the validity of worshipping Him.

 

The Alvar was unfortunately quoted in the wrong context,

in my opinion, and has been given a bad name. But please

think about it without getting emotional, and while you may

not necessarily agree with his sentiment, accept them as

the feelings expressed at one time of a great devotee of

the Lord, said out of a desire to defend Him.

 

thondar-adip-podi aazhvaar thiruvadigaLE saraNam

 

Mani