Guest guest Posted August 20, 1998 Report Share Posted August 20, 1998 Sri: Dearest Sisters and Brothers, Please find forwarded the second post on Amudhan by Sriman Sampath Rangarajan. Since he is on leave, I am blessed to perform this "kaimkaryam" to BhAgawathALs. Narayana Narayana Narayana dAsan Madhavakkannan > > Sampath Rengarajan [sMTP:srengara] > Wednesday, August 19, 1998 3:33 AM > vxmadhav > drAvida sruthi darsanaha - part 2 > > > > > Coming to puNNya kshEthram, it is said > in mnay purAnams that people who are > born in kudanthai are devas and that if > one even take one step to goto amuthan > sannithi from where ever he is, he gets > the palan of seeing this lord. Those who > live here even for a less time are never > born. Brahma did yAgan in this boomi. > > This is known as bAskara kshEthram as > Suryan did penance here as well. Suryan > constructed a temple for Sri > chakrthAzwAr. Sri thiru mazisai AzhwAr > did penance for 700 years and attained > Amudan's holy feet and his brindAvanam > is here. The shivan here known as > kumbEswaran was called as the first > Srivaishnava guru (due to his bhakthi > for amudhan) by purandaradAsar. > > Coming to AzhwAr aruLich cheyals, there > are 52 pasurams delivered by seven > AzhwArs on this Lord. thirumangai > deliverd one full prabhandham on this > Lord. it is in ratha bdhandam meter. > That is not all. If you are talking > about numbers. See this beauty in thiru > mangai's composition of thiru ezhu > koorirukkai. > > The numbers are stacked in progression > an entity in mathematics (*). Besides > this on pasuram itself represents one of > the six mukya upanishad. Leave all these > for now. It is this Lord who was > instrumebntal in revival of the entire > 4000 divya prabhandam through Sri > nadamuni. So without this Lord, where > are 4000 divya prabhandam and where are > those 105 divya desams that are sung by > the 12 AzhwArs. Since every Srivaishnava > owes this to Amudan, HE is without any > doubt the superior one. > > This is the very reason the ashtOthram > for this Lord has a verse as "drAvida > sruthi darsanaha:" > The entire "theLiyAna maRai niLangaL > theLikinrOmE" (we getting a clear > picture of the vedArttham from tamil > vedam or drAvida sruthi's darsanam or > view point as per shAsthram. > > Sri Komalavallith thAyar samEtha Sri > Aravamudhan thiru vadikaLE saranam > > Sampath Rengarajan > > > > > > ____ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 1998 Report Share Posted August 20, 1998 On Thu, 20 Aug 1998, Madhavkkannan, Vasudevan wrote: Dear members, I would like to second the request of Mani to all the members to be extremely careful when transliterating Sanskrit words. I am disappointed that inspite of the request many posts abound in transliteration errors. I wish the writers exercise better care, particularly when there is an accepted transliteration scheme for writing Sanskrit words in Roman script. I would like to offer my apologies if anyone is hurt by the above words but I felt it would be for the better, to point these errors. -gopal > > Coming to puNNya kshEthram, it is said ^^^^^^ puNya > > in mnay purAnams that people who are ^^^^^^^^ purANams > > the palan of seeing this lord. Those who ^^^^^ phalam > > This is known as bAskara kshEthram as ^^^^^^^ bhAskara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.