Guest guest Posted October 7, 1998 Report Share Posted October 7, 1998 Dear SrimAn Mani, Sempath and Dileepan, Thank you for pointing out that "AAmaruviyappan" is the name of the Perumal and not Siva at Terezhundur. I have checked it out myself and you are all absolutely right! I regret my awful bloomer ! It was not a mistake of the Sankara Mutt friend though. Last evening I checked out other aspects of the story with the same friend ..... I have no reason to disbelieve the rest of their version of the "shthala-puraAna". Whichever version of the "purAna" happens to be right, to me the story itself retains immense literary appeal. I think it is a wonderful lesson on the ethics of filial conduct. That's the "bottom-line" for me. Period. And as for your generalized comments about the authenticity of HH Sri ChandrasekharEndra Saraswati's accounts of "prabhandic history", I am afraid I am unable to agree with all that you say. (I greatly respect and admire the "Advaitin" or ("mAyAvAdin"!!) of Kanchi both as a tall religious leader of recent times and as a man of ideas. I have no intention therefore of being drawn further into this thread of discussion.) So shall we let this one pass, please? dAsan, sudarshan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.