Guest guest Posted October 22, 1998 Report Share Posted October 22, 1998 > Sri.K.M.Narayanan writes: > > "...... in case if it bagavat apacharam , Here God has discreation, > only here piratti's purushakaram comes in to picture. > like kakasura episode etc. etc." > > Isn't "purushAkAra" 'sine qua non' in all cases? > > Can one set limits to "pirAtti'spurushAkAra" and imply that it is > "ineffective" in cases of "bAgavatha-apachAram"? > > Can any learned member on the list please enlighten or clarify please? > > dAsan, > sudarshan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.