Guest guest Posted November 17, 1998 Report Share Posted November 17, 1998 [i forwarded Ramakrishnan's note to Mr. Bharat. Here is his reply.] Dear Mani I also have the Southern Recension of the Mahabharata.The Durga Stuti is there.So I went to the library and looked up the Poona Critical Edn quoted by your correspondent. And it clears up the matter. There are these three chapters in Bhishma Parva in the Southern Rec.: Ch 22 - Yudhishtira sees his army Ch 23 - Krishna asks Arjuna to pray to Durga Ch 24 -(just 10 lines)between Dhritarashtra and Sanjaya. In the critical edn the intervening Chapter 23 is scrapped and 22 and 24 are made into one Ch. And the following comment is given: "The only purpose served by this chapter(23) is to initiate the conversation between Krishna and Arjuna which was the needful preliminary for the interpolated Durgastuti chapter." Actually in my view the strongest argument in favour of the theory that Durga and Parvati were merged much later is the following: Kalidasa is accepted without question as the official biographer of the Siva Family.In Kumarasambhava Ch 7 he describes Parvati's marriage.Vishnu is also present - as a guest along with others.In Raghuvamsa Kalidasa specifically mentions Krishna's play on the banks of Kalindi.So at this time both stories were current.But there is not even a mention in the Parvati Kalyanam episode which goes into great detail re the ceremony that Vishnu was ever related to Parvati(even though K refers to Vishnu as Krishna more than once in RV); even more so when in RV in a similar context while describing Indumati's marriage(where many stanza's from Parvati's marriage are used)Indumati's brother is given a major part in looking after the guests etc with best wishes BHARAT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.