Guest guest Posted December 15, 1998 Report Share Posted December 15, 1998 Dear members and friends who are following this thread, On reading through some of my posts in the recent past, I came across some minor errors. I am extremely sorry for these and I would like to hasten to point out the most egregious of them to you. In my post #12 of December 13 I had written as follows: Quote: "The Vedic, more specifically Vedantic, tradition recognizes the following "alternate ways" which one can resort to in one's pursuit or apprehension of "para-brahmi-c" Truth : (1) "pratyaksham" ----- the evidence of the eyes; the Truth as it appears to the naked eye; "seeing is believing", so to say. (2) "anumAnam" ----- the Truth as may be derived from rational inference (3) "sabda-pramANam" --- the Truth as ingrained in the Vedic word, acoustic or "vAkya" (4) "yag~nyam" ---- the Truth attained through the Vedic deed of sacrifice Un-quote Way No. (4) above i.e the path of "yagn~yam" is not generally regarded as a "pramANam" in the strict Vedantic sense. Please disregard No.(4) and consider only (1) (2) and (3) for the purposes of our ensuing discussion. Thanks, adiyEn, sudarshan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.