Guest guest Posted January 11, 1999 Report Share Posted January 11, 1999 I did not want to get into the discussion on SrI agnihotram svAmi, but seeing some of the mail related to him, I feel it may be appropriate to raise a couple of thoughts: 1) It seems there is dispute about the contents of the SrImukham provided by him. One writer points out that SrI agnihotram should have refused to give a SrImukham if he did not want to give what will be "acceptable" in the view of the requester(s). Is it not fair to say that the persons(s) who requested the SrImukham should have known that he has independent views, and not approached him if they did not want to receive the views in the first instance? 2) By the same token, those who invited him to uttamUr svAmi's centenary celebration should have known about SrI agnihotram's views and style since these are well-known. I do not believe SrI agnihotram svAmi insisted on participating in any function uninvited. To go and invite someone of his stature and then to advise him what he should speak does not seem like a professional approach to me. -dAsan kr*shNamAcAryan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.