exchanges on Soundarya lahari

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Bhagavatas,

 

 

 

I have a basic doubt in relation to the above topic under intense emotional

discussion. I would like to see this discussion to turn the focus on to a

related aspect.

 

I have had occasions to study religious writings of repute and have always

observed this. The God in praise of whom the work is done is always elevated

and all others depicted as subservient to Him / Her. Srimad Bhagavatam, Devi

Puranam, Skanda Puranam are a few examples in point.

Similarly the relative positions or grade given to the Trimurthis.

 

I blindly believe in Sriman Narayanan. But I also feel very strongly that if

I have belief in Sriman Narayana I will not take refuge in other Gods. To me

such an action will question my very belief in Him. For the same reason I

would not like to lobby on His behalf as that is unnecessary and will go

against my very belief in him.

 

Once I read an episode in a commentary on Srimad Bhagavatam where Siva was

supposed to have taken refuge with Sri Mahavishnu. I couldn't the relish the

way the commentary expanded on the slokam. It was all in praise of

SriKrishna and Lord Siva was shown as asakthan.

 

The very same day I happened to read a commentary on SoundaryaLahari. As

you all know the slokas starts with varanaNa of the padathuli of Devi. I

read one sloka which said: Whereas all other Gods give their blessings

through their abaya and varada mudras Devi does not need such mudras and her

padaravindas do that job. Certain other slokas make direct comparisons with

Sri Vishnu and Lord Siva. To be honest, I couldn't digest the comparison.

The work also depicts Lord Siva as an asakthan without Sakthi which will not

be relished by Veera Saivas. But I could not rush to the conclusions against

Sri Adi Sankara - whose works on Sri Narayana and whose poetry I enjoy. So I

consoled myself that everyone tries to depict their ishta deivam as the

Supreme.

 

But we also see the same author praising various deities with similar

importance in his various works. May be this is a poetic convention. May be

I am too simplistic in coming to such a conclusion.

 

Why our religion has many Gods and why Bhagawatas should compare notes? I

am not very sure if I have framed my query properly. But I am sure everyone

will appreciate the confusion in the minds of an ordinary person like me.

 

Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan

Rajan