Guest guest Posted March 23, 1999 Report Share Posted March 23, 1999 Dear members, Re: Sriman Sadagopan's note: "The encouragement that I have given to the talented essayist , Sriman Sudarshan is to write about Sri Lakshmi Nrusimha KarAvalampana Sthothram and not about Soundarya Lahari in the Bhakthi forum . There should not be any confusion on this point ." This is absolutely right. I hope I have not caused the "confusion". Sriman Sadagopan and all the other members whom I named wrote to me w.r.t only the LNKS and not to the S-L. I did not in the first place raise any questions or issues about S-L except to state in passing that it had poetic virtues. Everything else other members have had to say on this matter (and indeed what a lot everyone has had to say!) the past week are simply no way connected or related to the simple and uncomplicated task I had set out to do viz. to pen or "essay" (as Sri.Sadagopan would have it) a few thoughts on the LNKS. This is just to set the record straight. Regards, Sudarshan P.S. In lighter vein (and I mean no offence to anyone here), may I be permitted to say that the 'bhakti-list' seems to have outdone our mythical "purANa-s" in recording the first ever instance of a "yuddham" between "mahavishnu and sudarshan"! Come on, guys... can't you laugh a bit... please ?! sudarshan Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.