Guest guest Posted May 23, 1999 Report Share Posted May 23, 1999 Dear bhAgavatOttamA-s, In the last post we saw how Sankara's "Bheekara-kareendra"… ireful tusker… made no distinction at all between Kaurava or Pandava as it strode through the battle-grounds of Kurukshetra like a lethal juggernaut, dealing death to one and all. We saw how an enraged elephant did not pause… not for an instant… to notice whom it was attacking when it simply picked up Subramanya Bharati, one of the greatest Tamil poets of pre-Independence India, and with one vicious lash of its trunk, left him dying in a Triplicane alley. We saw too how Hiranyakashippu's elephants, goaded to boiling rage by palace courtiers, rushed forth in a furious stampede to crush little Prahlada…. a mere child of six or seven years. In all the above instances, we see the blind, unbridled malevolence of a tusker running amuck. And so very much like a rogue-tusker's is the malevolence of Death too… the bhagavatpAdA vividly points this out to us in verse#6 of the LNKS. Like the crazed elephant, Death is no respecter of persons either. It strikes everyone that comes its way. When it strikes…and strike it does, sooner or later… it shows neither mercy nor clemency, it grants neither concession nor reprieve. And none so far has yet been born in the world from whom, it was said, Death flinched … Not kings and brave-warriors, not poets and sages, neither infant nor cripple… Death simply performs what it has unfailingly accomplished from time immemorial … and what it will always do until the end of time, viz.: signal the irrevocable end of the "journey of life"--- what Sankara bhagavathpAdA calls, "prANa-prAyaNa:"! ****** ******** ********** Our foregoing examination (both in the previous post and in this one) of the phrases "bheekara-kareendra" and "prAna-prayANa" in Verse#6 of the LNKS invites us, next, to go a little further distance down the trajectory of Sankara's poetic logic where our imagination probes the following questions: * Man tames the wildest, the most fearsome of elephants in the forests. Can he not likewise conquer Death? * If the most fearsome of tuskers can, with time and effort, be domesticated to serve him as mere beast of burden, can't Death too, likewise, be humbled by man to lighten the burdens of Life? * If the terrifying elephant can turn into a friendly, sometimes comic performer on a circus stage, can't Death turn an amiable ally of ours too? * If kings can ride in glory on elephant-back and parade themselves in gilded palanquins through the streets of their kingdom, why can't we also ride on the back of stately Death straight into the portals of the Kingdom of God? ********** ************ *************** At the end of Chapter 2 in the "bhagavath-gita", after a peroration in 60 majestic stanzas on the Vedantic doctrines of "gnyAna-yOga", "karma-yOga" and, to a fleeting extent, on the principles of "bhakti-yOga", Lord Krishna finally confides in Arjuna: EshA brAmhi sthiti-hi pArthA nainAm prApya vimuhyati I stithvAsyAm anta kAlE'api bramha nirvANam~ruchhati II (Ch.II.72) It is a sparkling verse of extraordinary, deep and subtle significance. "Having followed this exalted Way of Life ("EshA brAmhi sthiti-hi"), O Partha", Krishna says in the above verse, "the Man of Wisdom attains the state of being where there is no fear, no bewilderment ("na vimuhyati"). Having reached that state in the moment of Death even ("anta kalE'api"), verily, he enters upon the Kingdom of God ("bramha nirvANam~ruchhati")! Now, if you carefully read the Lord's words above, you draw the following meanings: · No, the conquest of Death is not impossible… not for the Man of Wisdom, the Vedantic Man · The conquest is made possible by the pursuit of the Vedantic Way of Life… through "gnyAna-", "karma-" and "bhakti-yoga-mArgA-s" · These "mArgA-s" lead to him to "bramha-stithi"… a state of being where there is no fear, no bewilderment ("bhava-bheeti"!) · It is the state in which, most certainly, he may look forward to riding the last leg ("anta kAlE"-- Tamil pun intended here!) of his journey in life ("prANa-prAyaNa") atop the back of Death itself … (as if it were merely a tamed "Bheekara-kareendra")… and soon enter upon the Kingdom of God … "bramha nirvANam"! ******* ********** ************ Writing an extremely moving sonnet on Death, and addressed to his own soul, the great poet, William Shakespeare once exhorted himself in these splendid lines which it is relevant to recall here: "Buy terms divine in selling hours of dross; Within be fed, without be rich no more. So shalt thou feed on Death, that feeds on men, And, Death once dead, there's no more dying then." (Sonnet CXLVI: "Poor Soul, the Centre of my sinful Earth") Now, … if "buy terms divine" were taken to be a clarion call to pursue the "yOga-mArgA-s" of Vedanta, … if by "selling hours of dross" we take it that the poet means those precious moments of a lifetime wasted away without Vedantic aspiration … and if by "Within be fed, without be rich no more" we take it that the poet urges his soul to care more for its inward condition than for bodily want … then doesn't it seem as though Shakespeare, in saying "So shalt thou feed on Death, that feeds on men / And, Death once dead, there's no more dying then."… in saying that, doesn't it seem as though Shakespeare was clearly echoing the Vedantic strains of Verse#72, Chapter 2 of our Lord's "bhagavath-gitA"?! ******** *********** **************** In the last post, if you recall, we quoted lines from a famous poem of Lord Byron just to illustrate the terrible mien of Sankara's metaphor of Death, "Bheekara-kareendra". Byron's awesome "Angel of Death" was sought to be shown as being the perfect mirror image of Sankara's death-dealing "tusker", the archetypal nemesis of human life. In this post, however, through the comforting words of the final verse of the Second Chapter of the "bhagavath-gitA", we learnt how the Ways of Vedanta, the ways of divine wisdom or "yOga-mArga", lead Man to the conquest of death. We then asked ourselves how Death too, like a tamed elephant, can be turned into a friend rather than the nemesis of Man. By way of a possible answer, another English poet, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, offered these words to show that the "Angel of Death" can be a benign one too! "What woulds't thou have a good great man obtain? Palace? titles? salary? a gilded chain? Or throne of corpses which his sword had slain? Greatness and goodness are not means, but ends! Hath he not always treasures, always friends, The good great man? Three treasures, LOVE, and LIGHT, And CALM THOUGHTS, regular as infant's breath: And three firm friends, more sure than day and night, HIMSELF, his MAKER, and the ANGEL OF DEATH ! (Samuel Taylor Coleridge: "The Good Great Man") ********* ************** *************** In the next post we shall proceed to the next stanza… Verse#7 …of the "lakshmi-nrsimha-karAvalmba-stOtram" where the subject of Evil is dealt with by Sankara bhagavathpAdA. adiyEn dAsAnu-dAsan, Sudarshan ____ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.