Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

(No subject)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Bhaktas

Adiyen say a writing on the reason for Vishnuchittar's tirunamam

"Perialwar". Let me add to it.

 

If the name was to be given to the head of alwars it should have gone to

Nammalwar.

If the name was to be given to the alwars who sung highest number of songs

again it is to Nammalwar or next to tirumangai alwar.

If the name was to be given to the first by birth it should have gone to

Poygai alwar.

 

Then why did Perialwar get the prefix PERIA. Swami Manavalamamunigal

explains in his Upadesa rattina malai " mangalasasanatil matrulla alwargal

tangal arvattalavu taan anri pongum parivale villiputur pattarpiran petran

peraialwar ennum peyar"

i.e. perialwars depth in mangalasasana gave him this name. All other alwars

when they had the glimse of the Lord immediately asked something for

themselves e.g. Nammalwar - "inninra neermai ini yaam uramai". whereas

perialwar alone did not ask anything for himself but sung pallandu for the

Lords feet. Other alwars have parivu for Lord but Perialwar alone has Pongum

parivu. There are many instances to prove Perialwars pongum parivu. Let me

give two:

 

Lord Krishna was born on rohini. Perialwar iterates this as "attatin patha

naal vandu tonriya achutan" ie. one who is born on the tenth day from Hasta.

Start counting from hasta to one side, would give you rohini and on the

other side would give you tiruvonam. Perialwar without explicitly mentioning

rohini, mentions hastam and the number only. Why ? Let people keep counting

and guessing as to which is the correct nakshatram ? If I tell Rohini then

it will reach to the ears of Kamsa and other dushta drishtis immediately ?

My Lord Krishna is now so young that he cannot bear all these drishtis. By

the time all these people keep counting 10 days and decide on which side to

count, Krishna would get older and then these drishtis would do no harm to

him.

 

Last of the alwars says Krishna did Sakatasura bhanga during 7th month -

"innambi piranda ezhu tingalil". Whereas the same story is told by Perialwar

as "naalgal or nalaindu tingal alavile" ie four or five months. What does

this mean. Is it four or five or 4+5=9, or 4x5=20 ?

Let people keep guessing ? IF not everyone would cast drishti dosham that a

7 month old baby has done sakatasura bhanga. By the time they decide on the

number my Krishna would be old and there would be no harm to him.

 

This shows that other alwars had parivu and Perialwar alone had pongum

parivu and so is the reason for his tirunamam.

 

 

____

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...