Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

LNKS 23 - 2 of 2

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

(continued from immediately preceding post#23 - 1 of 2)

 

Sankara, with the feigned innocence of a monastic apprentice, carried on

querying the "chAruvAka".

 

"Sire, but you know well that in this wretched world, to desire a thing is

one and to sate it is another matter. There is the cost of satiation that

must not be forgotten. It takes a lot of money these days to buy "ghee".

It's not cheap commodity. So what does the man to whom quaffing down "ghee"

has become the ruling passion of life… what is the poor fellow to do if he

finds he cannot afford "ghee"?"

 

"RNam kritvA!" retorted the unflappable "chAruvAka". "Let such a man as you

describe him to be… let him go about borrowing money any which way and by

any means he can… and from any quarter in the world… but "ghritam" or "ghee"

he must obtain and consume to his heart's content!"

 

This was the "chAruvAka" way of saying, "The end justifies the means… any

means!"

 

"Sire, but is it not imprudent," Sankara continued, "for a man to borrow

money? Debt ("Rnam") enslaves one's soul to another. Surely you know that,

don't you? And how can an enslaved soul be free to pursue the ends of

existence?" asked Sankara.

 

"Debt may be the bane of the soul in your matrix of Vedic values, O Sankara…

but it is not so in the lofty manifesto of our "chAruvAka-darsanam"", was

the laconic reply of the anti-Vedantin.

 

Sankara next tried a slightly different line of questioning.

 

"Sire, are you saying that in the lofty scheme of your wondrous "darsana"

there is no such a thing as "soul"?

 

"Bhasmee-bhutasya dehasya!" was the emphatic reply of the "chAruvAka".

"What is this thing called "soul" you Vedantins are so fond of talking

about?" he counter-queried the bhagavatpAdA. "It is nothing but a fanciful

figment of overwrought Vedic imaginations! For us "chAruvakA-s" the soul and

the body are one and the same. When the body lives and breathes, the "soul"

that you speak of lives and breathes too. When the body dies and turns to

ashes, your "soul" turns to ashes with it."

 

"Sire, in that case, does the soul enliven the body or the body enliven the

soul? Which enlivens what?" asked Sankara.

 

"Pah!" exclaimed the anti-Vedantin, "What kind of ridiculous questions you

Vedantins pose! Tell me this, O Sankara! When you munch "tAmboolam" (betel)

your mouth and tongue turn scarlet in colour, don't they? Now, I ask you,

what makes your mouth go red? Is it the betel-leaves? The areca nut? The

scented lime-paste? Or is it the warm flesh of your salivating tongue? Eh?

Which amongst them makes your mouth go red? Can you tell me?"

 

The "chAruvAka" paused a moment to let his dramatic question hang in the air

for effect. Then he answered it himself, "The answer obviously is: none of

the them individually can cause redness in your mouth; but all three…

betel-leaf, nut and lime… when chewed together as "tAmboolam" in the mouth

will certainly redden your tongue, isn't it? Likewise, neither body nor soul

(if there is such a thing at all) can singly constitute the material Cause

for the Effect of Life. But when "body" as one element and "soul" as

another, cohere… they "enliven" each other to form a third element called

"Life". As long as the constituent elements remain coherent, the resultant

element of "Life" too is sustained. When the constituents dissipate on death

and devolve to their elemental ante-state, the phenomenon of "Life" too

simply ceases to be.

 

"And that's all there really is to Life and earthly Existence, O Sankara!

But you Vedantins will never leave it all at that! You have to concoct all

your complex and fanciful metaphysics about the "jiva", the "brahmham" and

the "sarIra" or "body"… Your Vedanta, O Sankara, if it amounts to anything

at all, is nothing indeed but a conspiracy against the common man! You and

your entourage, after all, have to somehow make a livelihood, right?"

 

Sankara was amazed at the ingenious arguments of the anti-Vedantin! Crude

ideas whose "sound and fury otherwise signified nothing" were very nearly

made to seem like philosophy of the highest order!

 

"If, as you say, there is no purpose to earthly existence other than seeking

its temporal pleasures, then, I suppose, there is nothing like "svargA"

(paradise) or "naraka" (perdition) in the "chAruvAka-darsana"? There is no

system of moral reward and punishment? There is no ethical system under

which man must account for his deeds?"

 

To this the anti-Vedantin replied, "punarAgamanam kutaha- ?".

 

"O Sankara, we do have "svargA" and "naraka" in our system. But it is not

along the ridiculous lines of your "karma" theory where the so-called "soul"

of man casts off one body after another in a cycle of birth and death…

journeying relentlessly, back and forth, from this world to the ones beyond…

and along the way liquidating its outstanding account of sin and virtue… Oh,

no, we don't to that humbug you Vedantins have invented and now

retail!"

 

"What then is your idea of "svarga" and "naraka", heaven and hell?" asked

Sankara.

 

"Heaven and Hell, O Sankara, reside on this very earth. One does not have to

look into the empty skies for them. If a man should find ample means in this

world to satisfy his every desire for pleasure, that verily is the Heavenly

state. And if he but suffer deprivation of the means to indulge and fulfil

his passions… there indeed is the state of Hell", replied the "chAruvAka".

 

"Sire," Sankara bhagavatpAdA finally asked, "do you have the concept of

"mokshA"… eternal liberation… in your "darsana"?

 

"Of course", replied the "chAruvAka", "In our system of thought we consider

Death to be "mOkshA"… "Bhasmee-bhutasya dehasya"… Death grants us the

eternal liberation you speak of "!

 

********** ************* ************

 

In Sankara's times corruption and bankruptcy, in thought and morals, had

seeped so deeply into the society of India that masses of men actually

believed in the system of "chAruvAka-darsana" --- by far the most classic

example of the fungus of "anti-Veda" then destroying the eternal Tree of

Vedic Knowledge at its very roots.

 

We will continue in the next post.

 

adiyEn dAsAnu-dAsan,

Sudarshan

 

 

 

____

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...